Welcome!

edit

Hi OfficerManatee! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! RFD (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome aboard

edit

Welcome to WikiProject Firearms. I especially appreciate your recognition of the need to control commercial advertising. Please let me know if my experience can offer advice with Wikipedia formats or procedures. Thewellman (talk) 23:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


Thank you! I made note of the issue that I've noticed some particular articles seem to have problems with. I also seem to sense private entities are injecting material themselves, so active monitoring is certainly warranted.
Your timing is actually convenient, there seems to be a problem user/IP: 223.17.88.249 (contribs) that continues to edit various small arms/military pages, much of which is reverted or corrected and I figured I'd refer it to someone more experienced to handle or escalate it. I recently reverted their contributions on .458 SOCOM as they added an entirely commercialized section for Ammo Types, and figured a more experienced editor for firearms could review my changes to see if it was proper.
Secondly and probably more problematic is the seemingly constant contributions that IP makes to a wide array of other small arms and military/conflict pages; if my assumption is correct that most of their contributions need reverting, not sure how that is best handled but given how others have also added to its talk page, I assume I'm not the only one watching its activity.
Thank you again for the warm welcome, I look forward to assisting in whatever way I can.
OfficerManatee (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
I see what you mean. I typically approach such edits with a two-phased approach, initially tagging the unsourced material like this;[citation needed] and giving the editor a chance to provide a source citation before later deleting the edit if no source citation is provided within a reasonable time frame. I hope this gives the editor more encouragement to conform to Wikipedia conventions rather than simply rejecting their efforts. This citation needed format alerts those reading the article in the meantime to the questionable validity of the material. (By the way, you may notice how I have used colons in this response, and edited your previous response, to indent successive elements of a talk page conversation.) Thank you for your efforts to keep Wikipedia articles from accumulating unsourced material. Thewellman (talk) 01:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Understandable, thank you for the insight. Also thanks for the tip on formatting, still learning all the markdown and procedures that follow. OfficerManatee (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply