Occults
![]() | This user has an alternative account named OccultZone. |
Your confirmed status has been enabled. While this entry is useful, it would be more useful to others to have your primary account leave an edit on this user account (perhaps updating the sock banner) to make it clear you are the same person. It's too late now, but if you have to do this again, log in with your primary account and use that logged in account to create an alternate user, that way the creation log makes it clear. Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 16:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Done now . OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Demand responsive transport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Kan-go Hervey Bay]</ref><ref name="belengo.com">System developed and hosted by Belengo Pty Ltd ([http://www.belengo.com)</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki!
edit
Hello, Occults, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC) |
- @Ugog Nizdast: Yeah I've used. I just wanted to see that why some of our experienced editors had reverted a number of good edits after remarking them as "vandalism" with this tool. But I had also thought that if there is problem with the tool it would've been dismantled. But hopefully the tool is accurate, and it has been nicely designed. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- Experienced users reverting good edits? Hmmm...that's something I've not seen myself. However, I did make mistakes like this when I just started, but within a few days got used to it. Now I have a nearly zero percent error rate (judged mainly by not getting complaints or getting my edits reverted, maybe some go unnoticed?). As you know by now, it's mostly the editor's fault and not the tool's if they do such blunders, as they are given full freedom to classify the edit as innocent, pass, vandalism or good faith. Anyway, if you have any initial queries or issues with it, feel free to ask me here or on Wikipedia talk:STiki. Good day, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Occults, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Occults! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Happy Holidays!
editMerry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! | |
Hello Occults, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list