Obvioustrollisobvious

May 2008

I noticed the message you recently left to a newcomer. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Tresiden (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Noted. Obvioustrollisobvious (talk) 22:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}} (Replaced due to no response! :O)

• Wait a while please. You haven't really asked for help; you need to wait for an admin to review the unblock template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Don't know if you'll see this because i obviously can't write back to you.... but... :) Obvioustrollisobvious (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I've been blocked.... seemingly for no reason. The "reason" given in the blocklog is simply "User...", yeah... just one word...

So an explanation of what's going on would be cool! That way I can get back to recent changes patrolling :) Obvioustrollisobvious (talk) 23:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obvioustrollisobvious (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Erm, haven't done anything... lol wut?

Decline reason:

Your username violates our username policy — Tiptoety ^talk 23:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Username block. If I was an administrator, I'd Decline...... Dendodge .. Talk^Help 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Normanton on Trent

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Normanton on Trent, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Normanton on Trent is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Normanton on Trent, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)