Welcome! edit

Hello, Obrazcity, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Geniusology, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 14:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article edit

Hello, I am wondering if you are associated with Andrei Aleinikov in some way. The article is going to need sources that are not associated with him to establish notability. 331dot (talk) 11:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Thank you for asking.

I AM THAT INDEPENDENT SOURCE!

I found Dr. Aleinikov when I was the Editor of the .....

and I found his name in the book Кто есть кто (Who's who -- the Russian edition) together with most well-known political figures and scientists (Putin, Abalkin, etc.). Since I work in education, I approached Dr. Aleinikov and took an interview about his Creative Pedagogy.

But YOU WORRY ABOUT NOTABILITY, right? By the way, Russian Academy of Sciences DOES NOT publish anybody just for $$ like some other editions. GENIUSOLOGY IS MENTIONED THERE! Then I found Dr. Aleinikov's works in Russian, as far back as 1988 and 1989 -- Academy of Sciences publications. And people are using his works around the world --- so NOTABILITY -- no doubt -- is present.

His Creative Pedagogy is in 6 Encyclopedias and there is a special encyclopedia just about it. Geniusology is less known, but is already 14 years old and well published as well. So when I saw NO article on it in Wiki, I thought YOUR readers are missing. If YOU ARE ENCYCLOPEDIA, you care about info and readers being informed. Right? So if you need me to be you INDEPENDENT TESTER of Russian origin theories, you can use me.

Also, if you have more questions, please ask,

Cordially, Obrazcity (talk) 07:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If geniusology is well published, I look forward to you posting those sources to the article. Sources do not need to be in English as long as they establish notability as Wikipedia defines it. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Geniusology for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geniusology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geniusology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 23:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply