OTserInW

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav's Home (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gaurav's Home and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gaurav's Home, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 10:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello! OTserInW, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 10:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, I'm Babymissfortune. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 10:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Gaurav's Home

Greetings. Articles on Wikipedia are guided by a set of rules. The reason your submission was turned down is because notability isn't well established. There must be clear-cut significance and importance to the article for it to be worthy of being published on Wikipedia. To improve your submission, you could further elaborated the content of the article in terms of the events occurred to Gaurav's House, e.g. history, proceedings, business activities. Content of the article must however conform to WP:GNG and WP:GEOFEAT. Moreover, sources used on Wikipedia must be both reliable, verifiable and independent. Suggested sources would be major newspapers, widely-published book, high-quality generally trusted mainstream publications and Not blogs, MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, fansites, Twitter, their own website, a press release, wikis, or other sites with user-generated content like Trip Advisor. Your Google searches that you included on the submission doesn't qualify as a source. EROS ^message 10:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: I dont know why I am trout OTserInW (talk) 10:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)