Welcome!

edit

Hello, Nupamjo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as I.T.S Engineering College, Greater Noida, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 07:12, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Alistair Duff

edit
Hello - I see you have edited the article on Alistair Duff I created. I checked the webslinks you deleted and they are ok
this was one https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/sheriff-alistair-duff-arrested
this was the other one :
https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/1650893/sheriff-suspended-as-police-launch-sexual-misconduct-investigation/
unfortunately I am a new user to wikipedia, and I see when I try to edit it doesn't go into visual editor now.
I would appreciate your help to revert these changes.
This article is very important which is why I created it.
thanks
Charlie J R Spigot (talk) 12:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also , you have added a link in the first paragraph which does not relate to the appointment of Sheriff of Alistair Duff , but relates to the appointment of sheriff of his current wife J R Spigot (talk) 12:19, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have corrected everything now J R Spigot (talk) 12:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi J R Spigot, The references you are talking about have already added into the article, You should check again ref# 3 and 4. Nupamjo (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
yes, thank you. I managed to work out what I had done wrong , now I am good for inserting cite references.
If you view the history you can see I did the fixes. Sometimes you get a server error (not fatal 404) on one but it's all good. J R Spigot (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cheers. Nupamjo (talk) 15:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Singh Chauhan has been accepted

edit
 
Suresh Singh Chauhan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akevsharma (talk) 02:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhupal Ram Tamta has been accepted

edit
 
Bhupal Ram Tamta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Aafī (talk) 09:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indu (2021) has been accepted

edit
 
Indu (2021), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--VersaceSpace 🌃 07:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wheelchair Romeo has been accepted

edit
 
Wheelchair Romeo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 DIVINE  16:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Encrypted (film) (July 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nupamjo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharat Singh Chaudhary has been accepted

edit
 
Bharat Singh Chaudhary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijay Singh Panwar has been accepted

edit
 
Vijay Singh Panwar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

 DIVINE  16:49, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikram Singh Negi has been accepted

edit
 
Vikram Singh Negi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akevsharma (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khajan Das (July 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Urban Versis 32 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Urban Versis 32KB(talk / contribs) 18:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khajan Das has been accepted

edit
 
Khajan Das, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 02:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Dobhal has been accepted

edit
 
Sanjay Dobhal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dwaipayan (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shiv Arora has been accepted

edit
 
Shiv Arora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your move of Rudrapur, Uttarakhand Assembly constituency

edit

It was named such to distinguish it from Rudrapur, Uttar Pradesh Assembly constituency. Please move it back to the the original name. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank You MPGuy2824, I did it back. Nupamjo (talk) 14:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Error message

The page could not be moved, for the following reason:
The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid.
Please choose another name, or use Requested moves to ask for the page to be moved.
Do not manually move the article by copying and pasting it; the page history must be moved along with the article text. 
@Nupamjo Cut paste is not the right way to move, since the error message asked you to seek help you should have followed and asked help at WP:RMT. For now I have done this revert for you, so no need to ask but in future please remember to not cut paste text. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and WP:PAGEMOVE. The Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Indian constituencies) should be followed. Venkat TL (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Venkat TL, Thank You for your help. Nupamjo (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Venkat TL, One more question! Can we create a disambiguation page for Rudrapur, Uttar Pradesh Assembly constituency and Rudrapur, Uttarakhand Assembly constituency. Nupamjo (talk) 14:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Nupamjo already created at Rudrapur Assembly constituency Venkat TL (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ohh Yes, Thank You so much. Nupamjo (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Venkat TL Sorry for bothering you again and again but can we redirect Rudrapur Assembly Constituency to Rudrapur Assembly constituency. Currently it is redirecting to Rudrapur, Uttarakhand Assembly constituency. Nupamjo (talk) 14:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Done thank you. I forgot to do this, You caught it.   Venkat TL (talk) 14:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raj Kumar Pori has been accepted

edit
 
Raj Kumar Pori, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukesh Singh Koli has been accepted

edit
 
Mukesh Singh Koli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umesh Kumar (politician) has been accepted

edit
 
Umesh Kumar (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:GermanKity per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanKity. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ravindra Gautam (journalist)

edit
 

The article Ravindra Gautam (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced article doesn't demonstrate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply