User talk:Nthep/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

→

Archive 15

Deleted image

WHY THE HELL DID YOU DELETE MY PHOTO OFF THE WIKIPEDIA PAGE ABOUT MEEEEEE???????????? I DONT HAVE PERMISSION FROM MYSELF TO POST PHOTOS OF MYSELF ON A WIKI ABOUT MYSELF?? WHAT THE HELL!!!!!! PUT IT BACK ASAP! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redplanetent (talk • contribs) 05:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

You uploaded an image File:Mars Photo By Jim Fierra.jpg which is attributed to Jim Fierra saying that you are the copyright holder of the image and licence anyone to make any use of the image, anywhere, including commercial use which means the effect on the copyright holder of the photo could be quite great, if, for example, someone starting making copies of the photo and selling them, denying that revenue to the copyright holder. The copyright is normally held by the photographer who took the photo not by the subject of the photo unless there are different arrangements under a contract. So without proof that the copyright isn't held by Jim Fierra Wikipedia isn't prepared to take that risk of possibly breaching someone's copyright. As the notice posted on your talk explains Wikipedia needs to see evidence that either Jim Fierra as the copyright holder gives his consent for the image to be used or that he isn't the copyright holder and the person or company that does own the copyright gives permission. That can be in the form of an email sent to permissions-enwikimedia.org but it does need to include a statement from the copyright holder agreeing to publication. Once that consent has been submitted and checked out then the image can be restored but not prior to that. NtheP (talk) 07:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I own the GODDAMNED PHOTO! I PAID THE GUY TO TAKE THE PICTURE! I WAS GIVING HIM CREDIT. PUT THE PHOTO BACK AND MIND YOUR OWN FUCKING BUSINESS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redplanetent (talk • contribs)

Well. This guy's complete lack of manners makes me wonder. Is he worth blocking? MM (What's up pup?) - ^{(Chocolate Cakes ◕‿◕)} 10:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Just someone who's a bit het up. NtheP (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phil Rice

The article Phil Rice has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Very interesting but I didn't create the article. NtheP (talk) 09:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion review for File:Hispaniola greater funnel-eared bat in Los Haitises National Park.jpg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Hispaniola greater funnel-eared bat in Los Haitises National Park.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Silver overlay on porcelain and glass

Hello Nthep, I am 50 year old German (more concrete from Swabia) - first of all: my English is not perfect but I will try my very best. My article is about a very special technique to decorate non-conducting surfaces like porcelain and glass with purest silver by galvanization. This technique and the knowledge about it is almost forgotten. Most of German Silver overlay was produced in or around Schwäbisch Gmünd from end of 19th century. In this town which is also known as ´Silver City´ was a big exhibition in 2010 about Silverworks from there. Even a few Silver overlay items were shown in one glass cabinet and a bit was written in the catalogue but when I requested the exhibtion-makers about more details they couldn´t help me. Very bad experience ! I was in the city-archive to make more research, I contacted the artist Hans Kloss - one of the last "survivors", who learned the making of ´Silver overlay´ as a young guy in one of the firms close to Schwäbisch Gmünd (http://www.hans-kloss.de/texts/keramik.htm). I also contacted Mr. Otto F. Götz, who is the most important collector and archivist for glass by Jean Beck; a lot of his glass was enobled with Silver overlay. When my article was declined with reason of ´no reliable sources´ I answered that there are almost none. The reviewer told me that one reason could be how ´Silver overlay´is written and that he googled a lot of so called ´results´ very quick. But all you find are items of porcelain and glass. But no knowledge based of facts. Now I added Literature and Weblinks from my Germany Wikipedia article about Friedrich Wilhelm Spahr - (the English version about this maker of Silver overlay should follow after this first try in English Wikipedia). I simply don´t want that these arts and crafts will be forgotten and hope for upgrading by others when the article will find it´s place in Wikipedia finally. Sorry for that long text - I really hope that you can help me here in ´Teahouse´ !Silberbelagwaren (talk) 09:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, as your English is so much. much better than my German I don't think you need to apolgise for it :-) I've had a look at your draft article and I agree with the last reviewer, User:SarahStierch, that this is a much needed article and all it really needs is some inline citations. What Sarah means by this is that the sources you have listed just need to be linked to specific bits of the article text. So, for example, in the History section you have written In 1907, his experiments had paid off and won him prestegious awards at The World Exhibition in Bordeaux., if one of the sources you have listed say Gotz's 2009 article refers to this then you need to add <ref>Gotz, November 2009, page 40</ref> to the end of the sentence. So it would end up looking like this:

Markup	Renders as
In 1907, his experiments had paid off and won him prestegious awards at The World Exhibition in Bordeaux.<ref>Gotz, November 2009, page 40</ref> == References == {{reflist}}	In 1907, his experiments had paid off and won him prestegious awards at The World Exhibition in Bordeaux. References

Does this make sense?

You can use each source as many times as you want to support what the article says but you should aim for at least one reference for every paragraph in the article. Don't worry if the referencing isn't perfect. As long as I or another editor can look at it and realise what it is meant to say we can improve the referencing but what you need to do is to tell us which reference supports which article text. I hope this helps and you can understand what I am trying to say. NtheP (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for that quick and real assistant help. I will try that with the inline citations. Concerning the catalogue of exhibiton 2010 in Schwäbisch Gmünd I would really like to link to it´s pages but there is no online version available. Can I anyway name the pages where information is given ?Silberbelagwaren (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry that a source isn't available online, a full description of the print document is enough. The policy is that should anyone want to check the source out, they have enough information to know what to look for, so title, publisher, date etc for a print document fulfil this requirement. NtheP (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Nthep, I "updated" now my article and learned intensivly about sense and importance of inline citations. Could you check once more or do I have to make ´officially´ a new resubmit ?Silberbelagwaren (talk) 17:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've had a quick look and there are some sections that need more references like the first paragraph on Technique and the whole section on The Marks but I think if you resubmit it again it's more than likely that it will be accepted. I suggest you resubmit it and leave a message on Sarah's talk page to ask her to be the reviewer as she was the reviewer who asked for more references. NtheP (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Bible quotations

I've started an RfC concerning what should Wikipedia's policy be on the use of non-free Bible translations: Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 60#RfC: Use of non-free Bible translations.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

OTRS

File:Bronze sculpture of a Swallow-tailed Kite by Lee H. Letts, 1981.jpg has a copy at commons as well. Is the same ticket# valid over there? I made a category over there for her. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lee_H._Letts Permissions for all the images may be in the same email.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The ticket from Lee was specific about the one image so I've emailed her to see if she agrees to a CC licence for the ones in this commons category. NtheP (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Btw the uploader/editor is a she, and Lee the sculptor is a he.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:34, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

All sorted. NtheP (talk) 11:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleted image 2

You've removed Brown_and_McLeod at SASH. I have permission from the copyright holder. I thought I clicked through everything and made that clear but if there's something I missed please advise. I'd like to keep the photo up for a client. Many thanks in advance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Illliterature (talk • contribs) 21:57, 5 July 2013

You uploaded the image File:Brown and McLeod at SASH.jpg saying that evidence would be provided on request. On 27 June notification was posted on your talk page saying that the permission needed to be produced to permissions-enwikimedia.org, you haven't produced that permission so the image has been deleted. If you can produce the permission then the image can be restored. NtheP (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I just forwarded the email granting permission to the address you provided. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illliterature (talk • contribs) 00:59, 6 July 2013‎

Ok, have found it, please check your emails. NtheP (talk) 11:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle users

Start Snuggle

Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office ^connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail^{(talk • work)}, Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	This barnstar is being awarded to you for your exceptional solution to my problem in Teahouse. Thank you. ---$oH4M ❊  আড্ডা  08:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much. NtheP (talk) 11:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you once again but a talkback on my talk page would have been nice. Would like to collaborate on an article with me?

---$oHaM ❊  আড্ডা  12:27, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Depends on what the article is and when. My editing goes in spurts so I may or may not be around. NtheP (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Whenever you wish just notify me about the article. Since I'm a student I've loads of time!

Regards

---$oHaM ❊  আড্ডা  05:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Once again for the reply in teahouse. ---$oHaM ❊  আড্ডা  11:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

questions

	question
	errrrrrr , your advice doesn't even vaguely work . when you've come up with an answer , go to user talk : jjbernardiscool jj (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

It works fine if you aren't using the visual editor which is how you made the last change to your userpage. Try again but this time edit the page using the wikieditor which is the "edit source" tab not "edit this page". NtheP (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

	thanks
	thank you for your advice. jj (talk) 16:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

It's ok, I should have made this clear in my original reply. The visual editor doesn't support superscripting and subscripting yet. NtheP (talk) 16:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

i put you to the test

	to the test
	I put your power thing to the test . Thanks , it was right . If I ever need any other help , then I shall make this my 2nd choice , after the teahouse . jj (talk) 09:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

For your response. I left a message for you there. I was worried about that. I tend to overreact, don't want to brake any Wikipedia rule. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 17:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar

As the section title says, thank you! Its something that I can do to be helpful and I happen to have the time at present :) Thryduulf (talk) 09:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Image restored

I hope you won't take it as a personal affront, but I've undeleted File:Brittany Murphy grave.jpg. I put an explanation on the discussion.

In essence, I see this as part of a very troubling epidemic of editors thinking of WP:PUF as some kind of deletion discussion, when it is not. Lately, all anyone has to do is nominate an image and then refuse to discuss it, and the image will be deleted by default after some arbitrary period of time. That's not the purpose of PUF. The purpose of PUF is to dispute sources or licensing information of the images themselves, not to discuss content. There is no dispute that I took the photo, or that I released it as GFDL. If you (or someone else) dispute the content of the image, and would like to take it to WP:NFCR, you are of course free to do that. Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 20:57, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Not affronted in the slightest, I erred in closing rather than referring it to NFCR (or inviting the nominator to do so). NtheP (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much! Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 21:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2013

Delivered August 2013 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

-- EdwardsBot (talk) 10:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your work at the teahouse. No one else deserves it as much as you do. $oHƎM❊আড্ডা 09:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Had a few days off so it's very nice to come back to something like this. Thank you very much. NtheP (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Julia Mora Article

Ms.Mora is (Redacted) and has been for a while.You can confirm this with (Redacted). Or you can go to (Redacted). All information I put is accurate,factual,and absolutely relavent.

I'll repeat the advice given to you on your own talk page. If you are going to make allegations about the circumstances of another, then the onus is on you to supply evidence that supports what you are saying. It is not for others to disprove the allegations or find your evidence/sources for you. NtheP (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walters & Cohen (September 23)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Walters & Cohen.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 16:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Not my creation. Actual creator needs to be informed & perhaps AFCH needs a tweaking not to pick up page movers. 19:25, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Singpost

Hello, thank you so much for the comment at my talk page :D. Miss Bono ^{[hello, hello!]} 19:15, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stuart Hall (presenter) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Cardenio.jpg

I asked Future Perfect at Sunrise to re-add the image in The History of Cardenio without avail. Shall we ignore his threats of block by re-adding the image, or shall we abide to his word? Since you declined the DI-replaceable tag, maybe I hope you can either boldly re-add it image or talk to him? --George Ho (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I only declined the speedy as the image is already listed at Files for deletion and procedurally it is wrong to have two deletion processes running in tandem. NtheP (talk) 19:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh... I must have done bad grammar. I meant the image; sorry. George Ho (talk) 21:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm talking about the image as well. Once it was listed at FFD with a discussion running, it would be wrong for an admin to speedily delete the image as it isn't clear cut. NtheP (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

So can you re-add the image in the article then? George Ho (talk) 22:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Anyone could, but whether they should is a different question. The FFD discussion needs to run its course, a decision reached and the the fate of the image is known. The image being currently in an article or not, is not relevant to the deletion discussion. NtheP (talk) 22:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Lou Reed

Hi, Nthep. I'm only seeing his death reported in Rolling Stone, and apparently there was a Facebook hoax about his death perpetrated Friday[1]. It might be prudent to remove the death info from the page and lock it pending confirmation from other sources. ---- Rrburke (talk) 18:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

It's already protected. Main line news stories are starting to pick up the report from Rolling Stone so might be a wait and see. Either way we have the ability to have been caught out. NtheP (talk) 18:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, all other sources are citing Rolling Stone. Wikipedia is not the news, so I don't see much harm in removing it pending more info. Might be better than helping spread a hoax. ---- Rrburke (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Guardian is now reporting confirmation from his UK publicist - http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/oct/27/lou-reed-velvet-underground-dies NtheP (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2013

Delivered September 2013 by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2013

Delivered October 2013 by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

Speedy del of "Vera dick"

Hi, I've seen the speedy del notice about Vera dick you posted to me: I've moved from my talk and added to the real author's one: Thenick777. Just to clarify that I'm not the author I explain what happended: The page was saved as redirect by an user. After it, I've moved the title to the correct one: Vera Dick with capital "D", then I corrected the double-redirect link of Vera dick. After it, Thenick777 started to edit Vera dick (again)... and it resulted technically created by me. In that time I've seen nothing because I was out for walking. Anyway, due to the reiterate creation of this article despite warnings and in write only (I've seen by del log that it's the 3rd attempt), I'll watch user contribs. In case of another creation I'll notice him here. Regards :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 20:43, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that, a shortcoming of Twinkle. NtheP (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

No problem, just to clarify, technically, my "position" about that article. Greets :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 00:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)