Wikipedia

User talk:Nsaum75/Archives/2009/December

< User talk:Nsaum75
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Thelmadatter in topic Beer in Mexico

Archive moved

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments1 person in discussion

Fixing a bot error; User talk:Nsaum75 Commons/Archives/2008/February has been moved to User talk:Nsaum75/Archives/2008/February Skier Dude (talk) 04:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Chocolate

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Now you KNOW any woman is gonna swoon over the thought of chocolate!!! :D The article on chocolate is already quite long so a separate article on chocolate and its uses in Mexico (past and present) is a good idea. Ill do some digging for info in the morning.Thelmadatter (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

tone?

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You added the tone tag to the "Syrian towns and villages depopulated in the Arab-Israeli conflict" article right? Can you please explain what section that have the inappropriate tone.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Oaxaca villages

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

yeah, I remembered that I visited these two places a long time ago tho who knows what happened to my photos of them. Sad too as I had a tour of one of the rug workshops in Teotitlán. If you happen to have photos, great! Otherwise, it just means I have to go and visit again! :D Still have Santa María de Tule and Guaymas to work on. I used to live in Arizona way back when and Im ashamed to say I didnt visit as much of Sonora as I should have.Thelmadatter (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Worked on Santa María del Tule today as I had to monitor a computerized TOEFL iBT exam... boring as hell as the computers do all the work and my assistant does most of the monitoring. Good to be the boss ;)There are lots of photos of the tree in Commons, of course, but almost nothing of the town.Thelmadatter (talk) 22:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

caring

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In response to this, some of us do care, but are not sure the best way to put an end to the obviously inappropriate comments. My one idea was too late to actually check. That user pisses me off more than most on the "other side", mostly because I see how incredibly offensive and foolish the comments are, but also because it dissuades me from participating in some of the conversations because I do not wish to be associated with such comments. Just ignore what the user says, everybody with half a brain can see that it is for the most part uninformed bullshit. Take care, nableezy - 23:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I just wanted to say I tried to reason with this user previously about the inappropriateness of their ongoing commentary here. Comment was deleted with an edit summary reading something like "delete lies". Anyway, I share Nableezy's frustration and (used to share) some of your tentativeness regarding the language issue. Its becoming increasingly difficult though to continue to extend an assumption of good faith. I gave up shortly after I left the message linked to above. Anytime you want to open an RfC, let me know. Those are, however, usually, a colossal waste of time and I'm quite sure someone will eventually just block him/her for their inanity without it. Until then ... you have my sympathies too. Tiamuttalk 19:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Files listed for deletion

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 18 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. -FASTILY (TALK) 21:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Have fun with that -- I've moved it to the commons. --nsaum75¡שיחת! 00:33, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Sakowitz

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Hi, thanks for the interesting link. I didn't know they had a store in Cincinnati. I haven't been editing very much lately because of recent trip to the hospital, but doing well now. I hope to work on Baytown or Johnson Space Center. Take care, Postoak (talk) 03:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Good to hear you have a new camera. What cam did you get? Today would be a great day to take pics, the sun actually came out after all of the rain. :) Postoak (talk) 20:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Looks like a nice camera, congratulations. GBA, yes, glad that is over...for now. :) Postoak (talk) 06:53, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Now wasn't that one hell of a typo! So sorry. I was expecting bells, sirens, buzzers, a NPA template and a personal reprimand from Jimmy :) Postoak (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Updates to Grupo Modelo

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I wish to understand what's wrong with my last update...

The reverted information about Grupo Modelo is wrong: there are not any Cisneros nor gomez in Grupo Modelo's history. Thats the only change I made in the last update, in fact, I've maked some reference to other wiki article to bring a reliable source, as you can find in the article of María Asunción Arambuluzabala (Grand daughter of Felix aramburuzabala, one of Grupo Modelo's founders)

I understand that Wikipedia is not intended to promote our brands but I think that is really important ensure that the information is accurate and true.

If you know the reliable source of that information about Cisneros and Gómez, please tell me how to find it in order to make the corrections.

Greetings from Grupo Modelo México

--DCI 2010 (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Houston schools documentary

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you! I could use it as a source to bulk up several articles related to Houston. :) WhisperToMe (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

sig tip

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This is assuming you want to have the talk link to not be fragmented. Have the talk page link in your sig formatted as follows:
<sup>[[User talk:nsaum75|{{lang|he|¡שיחת!}}]]</sup>
This will make the complete sig look like this:
nsaum75 ¡שיחת!
And like this with the current time and date
nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 19:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC) (the link will be there, just on this page it will just be bolded as a self-reference). nableezy - 19:05, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem, any other coding question you have feel free to drop me a line. nableezy - 22:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually, make it like this:
<sup>[[User talk:nsaum75|!שיחת¡‎]]</sup>
That will shorten the code displayed but retain the formatting. Did not think that it would substitute the {{lang|he}} parameter. (copy from the code here, not from the text displayed on the page, a control char does not display even with the nowiki tags)nableezy - 01:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Beer in Mexico

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey... care to chime in on the discussion page of Beer in Mexico? A user named Ronz is giving me grief over most of the sources I used to expand that article. While one or two might be questionable to those unfamiliar with Mexico-based sources, he is needlessly objecting to and starting to delete information simply because he thinks the source is unreliable. Id like to avoid an edit war.Thelmadatter (talk) 04:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nsaum75/Archives/2009/December&oldid=1143202079"