Re: Notability of Interfaith Furnishings edit

This organization is notable due to its ongoing, valuable service to New Jersey, which has been covered no fewer than five times by two of New Jersey's largest newspapers (see References). In addition, it is currently under review by the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships for recognition nationwide. Notablenews (talk) 06:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Interfaith Furnishings edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Interfaith Furnishings, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Interfaith Furnishings seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Interfaith Furnishings, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Interfaith Furnishings edit

Interfaith Furnishings was restored as per user's request. You have to immediately go back and work on it try to assert notability. I have placed a hangon tag for you to delay deletion but it's up to any admin to judge and act on it. Please remember to sign your posts in Talk pages by adding four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 12:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jersey's Talking edit

There must be contemporary new reports, magazines, listings, awards etc.? Rich Farmbrough, 11:34 9 March 2009 (UTC).


Fair use rationale for File:IFLogo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IFLogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 05:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Notablenews. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Interfaith Furnishings, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Uncle Roy (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, M. Editor. I primarily update, as an unpaid volunteer, those in need served. Notablenews (talk) 02:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)notablenewsReply

Re: I/We and You and Your Work ... (Re: The Case for Restoring the Article Regarding Interfaith Furnishings) edit

Dear M.,

I have labored with this organization - and have provided clear, concise, and accurate information.

This organization is legitimate, is recognized, and is noteworthy and respected on The Randolph Township Municipal Website and The Morris County Library Website.

This organization continues to be almost annually acknowledged by the Russ Berrie Award Foundation.

I have cited repeated coverage from local and county writers who are – or were – with legitimate publications (e.g. The Randolph Reporter, The Morris County Daily Record, and NJN-TV).

I have also cited: Even appointed representatives with M(r.) Barack Obama's White House administration have officially recognized our struggle.

This is indeed a Wikipedia-worthy organization based on the facts I've presented – and more than 1,000 families have benefited from volunteer efforts.

I hope you will restore my many hours of significant writing and fact-checking upon reading my plea.

Sincerely, --Notablenews (talk) 02:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)M(r.) Christopher S. Welch Volunteer, Interfaith FurnishingsReply

Proposed deletion of Interfaith Furnishings edit

 

The article Interfaith Furnishings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Most of the coverage received isn't in-depth enough to ascertain notability, moreover all of the coverage it did get was localised, run of the mill and bunched together, suggesting no lasting notability. The majority of the article is just a list of participants with no in-depth claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 12:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Interfaith Furnishings logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Interfaith Furnishings logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply