NotaToken
| This user is a student editor in Howard_University/Black_Women_and_Popular_Culture_(Fall_2021) . |
Welcome!
editHello, NotaToken, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
edit
Hello, I'm Wizzito. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Black Women Radicals have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. wizzito | say hello! 17:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Black Women Radicals
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Black Women Radicals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://aaww.org/postauthor/black-women-radicals/, https://www.blackwomenradicals.com/about, and https://www.blackwomenradicals.com/about-continued-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vaticidalprophet 17:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Feedback
edit@NotaToken, Apitter2389, and Trinitywb: Your article was deleted because it included content copied nearly verbatim from the source, which is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Everything you add to Wikipedia needs to be written entirely in your own words. Short quotes are acceptable when the precise wording matters, but need to be clearly marked as quotes.
It wasn't clear from your draft whether you are talking about a specific organization or an ideological grouping. If it's an organization, you need to rely on sources that tie the people you write about to the org. If it's a school of thought, you need to rely on sources that describe these people as adherents to that school of thought.
In addition, your work had problems in terms of the tone. You need to write in a tone that's neutral. And you need to attribute opinions instead of stating them as facts. For example, you wrote To be a Black Woman Radical, one must identify as a black woman...
While that's probably reasonably true, it's best to say that this is BWR's definition of a Black Woman Radical. Try to keep your writing a bit more boring, a bit drier. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. You're writing about an organization. I edited my comment above. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Ian (Wiki Ed), sorry to bother, but I left a few messages on your talk page. Please give them a look when you have time; there are a few other things with this course I pointed out. wizzito | say hello! 18:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Just a note that I've reverted your move of User:NotaToken/Black_Women_Radicals into mainspace, as it appears to duplicate an existing article (Black Women Radicals), and still had sourcing and copyright issues. I've removed the copyright violating content from the draft. Thanks, firefly ( t · c ) 16:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Please stop moving your sandbox to mainspace. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ian (Wiki Ed): It appears that the article also exists in mainspace as what looks like a copy-paste of the draft discussed here, with the same potential copyright issues. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Blablubbs Yes, looks like another member of the same group created that version. I'll clean up the copyvio now and follow up. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Black Women Radicals for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Women Radicals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.