Not retired

August 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Voter ID laws in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - please stop edit warring on this page & discuss any further changes to this page on the article's talk page. Guy1890 (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

REPLY

Thank you for your personal opinion. I will discuss on the Talk:Voter ID laws in_the United_States. "Photo ID Required" is a better, direct reference for Voter ID laws in the United States. It is a statement of fact instead of your editorial of "Strict". Since you value fact over ideology, I have to assume opinion as well but when you use the word strict, you are projecting an opinion. When that happens, who is really the vandal? Not retired (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Not retired, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Not retired! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)