User talk:Northern Moonlight/Archives/2023/September
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Northern Moonlight in topic Deleted judge pages
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Deleted judge pages
Hi Northern Moonlight, I'm just curious, for the judge pages that were deleted last month, I didn't follow these comments:
- "Note that WP:JUDGE is a necessary but not sufficient criteria for notability."
- "Hmm. Per WP:JUDGE, holding office is only a secondary criterion. People who satisfy this criterion will almost always satisfy the primary criterion,"
Could you walk me through these points, please? I want to be sure I understand how the notability requirements work. Thanks! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello!
- I retract my second statement. That isn’t quite correct.
- The judge articles obviously fail the basic criteria of WP:BIO (presumed notable) and only meet additional criteria (likely notable), which
does not guarantee that a subject should be included
. Per WP:BIOSPECIAL, if it fails basic but meets the additional criteria, it should be merged to a broader article. So if you want to recreate those articles as REDIRECT to a list of judges, that’s fine by me. NM 03:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)