Welcome

edit
Hello Northern Lights 2000, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Northern Lights 2000, good luck, and have fun.Paul  Bradbury 09:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Jean-Marie Speich. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Paul  Bradbury 09:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jean-Marie Speich, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Paul  Bradbury 11:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Jean-Marie Speich. Paul  Bradbury 11:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC) Despite the bulk of reference materials cited, it is observable that certain contributors are aggressively trying to place undue tags in this article.Reply

Some claim that knowing (a close relationship with) the subject personally, would be tanamount to serious violation against being objective in writing about the person in question. This will be true if a contributor includes information that are unsubstantiated with suitable reference materials. However, it seems more biased if one deletes contirbutions of wikipedians without substantial support to contrary claims, at least by pointing out objective reference materials; or worse, to places tags for some kind of paranoid reason. It is an insult to sensibilities of contributors who include information substantiated by citations, when such presumptive tags and comments are stamped on wikipedia articles.

On the otherhand, contributors who know the subject personally are more knoweledgeable about this subject.

For this reason, I remove the tag you placed on 17 August 2015.--Northern Lights 2000 (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply