User talk:Nonidavis/sandbox

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Asj'a Thompson in topic Asja's Peer Review

Raegan's Peer Review

edit

I enjoyed reading your lead paragraph and saw a lot of good/valuable information. The first sentence was a very interesting lead statement. I would recommend that you try to stay away from words or statements that implies bias feelings. Instead of saying most Indian girls, maybe try saying just Indian girls. In the sentence "Many people believe that spending money on educating girls is a as waste of money because their main goal should be learning how to properly raise a family, and take care of the household", I would try to sound more neutral. The sentences that explains that many girls have to worry about being sexually assaulted, maybe backing that up with a source/citation. The grammar looks pretty well. Make sure you incorporate a comma in the last sentence. Overall great job! RaeBruce (talk) 23:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mychelle's Peer Review

edit

The concept and point you're making in your draft are very clear. I personally would suggest that you stay away from prepositional words like many, most, etc.. unless there are some statistics to back up your statements. Your grammar seems fine, a comma is needed in the last sentence. Overall, your article so far is leading on the right track. Lastly, I would say to speak in a more neutral tone because you don't want the audience to feel like you're biased to one side in this article. Where specifically are you receiving this information (cite your sources)?(Mychelles (talk) 03:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC))Reply

Jayna's Peer Review

edit

The content of your article is interesting, but adding more details of what you plan to contribute would make the first draft more effective. I also didn't see any sources to back up your claims in the article. Your spelling and grammar, is fine, but more details of your contribution overall will make a more effective Wikipedia contribution.JayKMPix (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Asja's Peer Review

edit

I chose your article because mine is based in India also, however, I’m focusing on child labour in India rather than the education of women. While reading your draft I noticed some words which indicate some bias. For example, when you state, “The conditions of their schools are disastrous compared to the all boy schools. The all girls schools are overcrowded, with unsanitary conditions, and improper learning materials.” I feel as though you could reword this portion so that it sounds less opinionated. Furthermore, you state, “Many people believe that spending money on educating girls is a as waste of money because their main goal should be learning how to properly raise a family, and take care of the household.” Instead of saying “many people believe” I feel like it’ll be more effective if you instead gave a statistic related to that information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asj'a Thompson (talkcontribs) 05:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply