Nobleeagle has retired, possibly permanently, as a Wikipedia editor and may not be returning, at least not for the forseeable future. I may however make the odd visit back. Best wishes and good luck!


This user was blocked indefinitely per his/her request. --Nlu (talk) 06:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

?

edit

Nobleeagle, what is all this ? I hope you are only on a break and will soon come back. Tintin 06:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, please tell us what exactly is happening and why you are doing it. It is will be a big shame if you had to go. GizzaChat © 06:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hey!! What happened? - Aksi_great (talk) 11:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Gosh, I'm sorry to see this. Do reconsider—you are an outstanding editor and it would be a pity to lose you. Whatever your decision, for whatever reasons it was made, it has been good working with you. Hope to see you around again sometime.
Best wishes, Xdamrtalk 12:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hope to see you back here sooner rather than later. If you ever need help resolving a conflict on Wikipedia let me know.—Perceval 01:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

edit

Hello Noble. I think that you requested a block as you were unable to give time to other issues of your life or may be you were getting a little perturbed at happenings here. I am just making a guess and it may be far away from your reason to request for getting blocked. In case, you feel that you do not want to edit here for some time, it is normal and for this a self-requested block is not required. Please make a request for lifting the block and please be around once in a while - please take a wiki-rest, and come back with new thoughts and energy. Please remain a part of the Project, and please reconsider your decision. All the best! --Bhadani 15:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Some people has a tendency to drive away other editors as they feign to be master of certain topics and such wikipedians are the greatest threat to the Project in its emergence to its full potentials. This is a random thought based on my feelings as people tried to drive me away for months but I continued to hang on with tenacity though I stopped actively contributing due to a variety of reasons. --Bhadani 15:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

yep, Noble listen to Bhadani... dont let dab chase you off wikipedia. I must point you out to a lil' message you left on my talk page months ago that spurred me to return to wiki, [1]. Role reversal of sorts! Dude, take a wiki break and comeback. The project needs you. A real Khatri never raises the white flag before "the enemy" (pardon the euphemism, it flies in the face of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_battleground )...

I do sincerely hope that you return to us... Amey Aryan DaBrood© 20:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok... now i get the picture. I agree the whole matter is serious. Infact some nutjob ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/216.75.2.64 ) put up my personal info on my userpage. Though i've always been a bit careless about my true identity, it appears that my address was gleaned off from MySpace. I got my userpage deleted. You ofcourse must have your reasons for keeping your identity a secret, i do hope hope you come back in a new avatar after a wikibreak ofcourse. If there is anything i can do for you, then feel free to email me: ambrood_at_gmail.com. Amey Aryan DaBrood© 15:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Although the information was flawed, the fact that someone was trying to identify me did contribute to my decision. It appears that Damareinu has a habit of trying to work out people's real life personalities and has attacked other useful contributors as well... There are, however, actually other factors that also contributed to my decision. I appreciate the concern of everyone here, but this was a decision I have made and I'm not going to be changing the decision anytime soon. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 02:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
it's a shame you are gone. less cojones now.--D-Boy 07:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Observations

edit

I got alerted of the fact that Lage Raho Munna Bhai, an article which I worked on a lot, is on the road to FA promotion so I thought I'd just come back and write my congratulations (if anyone can convey them) to Dwaipayanc and Classicfilms, for doing what I couldn't. Great job! The article's brilliant and deserves to be the first Bollywood film to appear on the main page. :) Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 02:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've unblocked you. You can tell them yourself -- Samir 02:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thankyou. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 03:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
And my congratulations, Nobleeagle. Lage Raho Munna Bhai is now an FA.--thunderboltz(TALK) 05:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your congratulations - and thanks for your past contributions to the article. -Classicfilms 05:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
It's nice to see you back in wikipedia. I've sent an email to Samir asking for something. Samir may contact you. Lage Raho.. is FA now. Three cheers for Gandhigiri ! --Dwaipayan (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Its nice that you returned back. Good works guys, Lage Raho Munna Bhai, the first Indian film to become a FA. Congrats and thanks for support. Amartyabag TALK2ME 07:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hey hey hey...hold it...I'm not fully returning or anything, I just noticed this and decided to offer my congratulations, Samir unblocked me or I was hoping that someone would just point Dwaipayanc and Classicfilms to my message. Particularly after seeing the state of things on my watchlist, I don't really think it's worth it. As I said before, my decision to leave was complex and a result of long thinking, with many factors weighing in, most of those factors still weigh in. If I make any edits it wld probably be working on cricket or movies or something, away from the controversy. Regards Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 08:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Welcome back for a short while at least :). As a suggestion, even if it takes a long time, you may want to "unwatch" every controversial article. I am going to do the same once the most recent and hopefully last arbitration is over. And I second Dwaipayan's Gandhigiri's comment. Good to see you back mate! GizzaChat © 08:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Actually just click Special:Watchlist/clear to start afresh. Every page will be removed. GizzaChat © 08:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good to see you around again :) --Xdamrtalk 12:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Good to see you around. Do keep popping up like this. :) - Aksi_great (talk) 12:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
As a reply to DaGizza. It reminds me of Lage Raho Munna Bhai actually. I remember a quote from Circuit: "Bapu ayenge, desh ki haalat dekhenge phir vaapas chalejayenge" (or something to that extent). The idea of more Arbcom affairs, including ones where personal identities and private emails are exposed, isn't an encouraging sign. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 04:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hi Noble! There are both encouraging and discouraging signs everywhere! Please remain here. If needed, start afresh. Do some Gandhigiri! Have a look at the purely encyclopedic aspects...see, the way India project is churning out FAs! Isn't it great? Have a look at the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Featured and good content, isn't it good to see? Well, Classicfilms and I were having talks whether Gandhigiri itself can be improved. Have a look at the article and its talk page.
Regarding Main page request for LRMB, there is a problem. Lack of free images. What do you think?--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Are You back? Great things are happening with the cricket project; such as we just had a big FA drive where we got about 4 or 5 articles up to FA and it's still going. Although, you're greatly missed in articles such as list of world cup records etc. which isn't maintained like it was use to be by you.--THUGCHILDz 04:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Triple Crown

edit
 
I, Durova, recognize Nobleeagle with the Triple Crown for exceptional content improvements to Wikipedia. Thank you for all you do. DurovaCharge! 00:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your Majesty, it gives me great pleasure to bestow the Triple Crown in recognition of your contributions to Wikipedia. May you wear them well. DurovaCharge! 00:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:India_Quizmaster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. OsamaK 12:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:India_Quizmaster_Round1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. OsamaK 12:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Spiffier triple crown, new awards available

edit
 
The standard triple crown.

Hi, I've been sprucing up the triple crown awards. Here's the new version of the standard triple crown you've already earned. Feel free to replace your old one with this if you like the new version better. I've also introduced two new triple crown awards for editors who've done a lot of triple crown work: the Napoleonic and Alexander the Great edition awards. If you're active in a WikiProject, check out the new offer for custom WikiProject triple crowns. I'll make those upon request if five or more editors qualify. See User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle for more information. Thanks for your hard work, and cheers! DurovaCharge! 21:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:OldPIIRreview

edit

A tag has been placed on Template:OldPIIRreview requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

edit

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008

edit
Project News
  • Tag & Assess 2008, an assessment drive initiated by the assessment department began on June 7, 2008 and will be running until July 2008. Many Wikipedians have started contributing to this mammoth task. This housekeeping activity will help manage articles in better way. You can also get involved!
  • Bot Assisted Assessment was successfully done using Bot0612 in May 2008. 1744 articles (18.5%) of all India unassessed articles were marked if they had been assessed by some other project.
  • What's Featured and Good?
  • IPL was hot on Wikipedia too!!! During the tournament, the article was among the most frequently edited articles. It is currently the only Indian article in top 100, occupying 58th spot.
  • Do you know of an article that is currently underrated? If so, please nominate the article at the Assessment Department's request for assessment. This will allow our project to get a better idea of the quality of our articles.
Article statistics and to-do lists
Current proposals and discussions
From the Editors
  • If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject India and also may choose to get this newsletter get it delivered as desired.
  • This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – July 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
  • The last newsletter was more than a year ago and after feeling the pinch, we got together in working towards in renewing this feature for our members. Fresh pair of legs we are, and hence can greatly improve with your suggestions and ideas. Please feel free to let us know of your thoughts. We hope to release the newsletter on a monthly/bi-monthly basis as per our initial thoughts.
Contributors to this Issue
Did You Know?

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Reply

AfD nomination of Bir Banga Hindu Prajatantra

edit
 

I have nominated Bir Banga Hindu Prajatantra, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bir Banga Hindu Prajatantra. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

edit

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

edit

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:48, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rajnath Singh.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Rajnath Singh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Task force roll call notice

edit

Hello! Your username is listed on the Indian cinema task force participants list, but your user contributions show no activity within the past 18 months. Consequently, we've taken your name off of the list. If you still consider yourself an active editor of the task force, we encourage you to please add your name back to the Active Members list. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:BCCI logo.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BCCI logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 02:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can the EU be said to have a 'geography'?

edit

Would you like to look at this discussion:Talk:European_Union#EU_has_a_geography.3FAndrewing123 (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tripura cricket team

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tripura cricket team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PaoloNapolitano 14:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

edit

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC) Reply

MfD nomination of User:Nobleeagle/China as an emerging superpower

edit

User:Nobleeagle/China as an emerging superpower, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nobleeagle/China as an emerging superpower and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nobleeagle/China as an emerging superpower during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 18:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:India Quizmaster1.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:India Quizmaster1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Sbhushan/OIT

edit

User:Sbhushan/OIT, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sbhushan/OIT and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Sbhushan/OIT during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Himachal Pradesh cricket team

edit
 

The article Himachal Pradesh cricket team has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NickCT (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Nobleeagle/India as an emerging superpower

edit
 

Hello, Nobleeagle. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "India as an emerging superpower".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Nobleeagle/India as an emerging superpower}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have posted this to mainspace since it is not suitable material for G13 deletion. SpinningSpark 22:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Narula

edit
 

The article Narula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be original research; nothing but surnames found in Google Books and Google News archive searches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Miniapolis 23:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of India as an emerging superpower for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India as an emerging superpower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India as an emerging superpower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 16:12, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:PIIRreview

edit

 Template:PIIRreview has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:PPASPC

edit

 Template:PPASPC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Indiacricketvenuemap.jpg

edit
 

The file File:Indiacricketvenuemap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 23:32, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Indian cricket team records for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian cricket team records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian cricket team records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply