Njirlu
Enough, please edit
Stop adding unsourced claims of "Macedo-arman" origin etc. to biographical articles (incidentally, the word doesn't even exist, and the spelling is certainly not English). Wikipedia works with citations from reliable sources, and what you are doing is disruptive to say the least. You risk being blocked for your edits, and if you continue like this, without even the semblance of a discussion, I'll report you personally. Dahn (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rich Farmbrough, 20:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC). 20:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
in the name of truth
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please understand that “Macedon-arman” (in Macedon-armans: Makedon_armanji) exists since 3 thousands years. The etimologie “armans” exists since Macedonia was captured by Romans in 2 century before Christ. Until then ,they were only Macedonians.
These name is an official one .We have our council “Macedon-armans council” (Consiliul Makedon-armanjiloru di iutsido) with headquarters in Albania. In our worl now, in a beautiful Europe, the time for showing the truth has come. These people has done so much for the others in all Balkan States.They are everywhere but still nowhere. For example a family son and father , one in Greece speaks Macedon-arman and greek and is the prime minister and of course a truth greek , an ancient greek; the other in Romania and spaks Romania and Macedon-arman and is president and of course a truth Romanian. And they are family.We see how hilar is the situation? We the Macedon-armans are Macedonians and only Macedonians Romanized.Not Greeks, Romaniasn, Albanians, Serbians, Bulgarians, Fyromians nor Chinese. These people has done so much for the Balkan States and what they receive.They receive “shut the fuck up” and “you are nobody”, especially in Greece. Why ? Simple. Because they upressed and persecuted for many centuries. They tried to still our identity, our history, our right to education and culture in our own distinguished language, proclaiming that we are ancient Greeks and the conversation is over. These is the attitude for many centuries. So , in our beautiful Europe tha time for truth has come. The Greeks lied Europe and The entire world for such a long time. They lied Banks, Institutions, Nationa states, organizations from all over the world. We are Macedon-armans, not Albanians, Slavs Bulgarians, Slavs Fyromian, Serbs, Romanians, Greeks. We are Macedonians and our ancestors are Philip Macedon and Alexander Macedon and our flag is Vergina Sun. Our modern history make big part of history of all Balkan States and ottoman empire. We gave such a great things to all Balkan peoples and we receive nothing.Is these justice in our Europe? We don’t hace the right to express in our language, to education and culture, to identity? Why? Because Greeks fear us? We gave so much!! We still are political persecuted.We still are political oppressed. Still when? Europe cant help us in the name of truth? You cant help us in the name of truth? I hope you are not greek.:) So in yhese conditions please give me the right to modify or to add yhe origin where is just and necessary. We go in America and we hear that personality, great Romanian, great Greek, great Albanian, great Bulgarian and so on. And when we tell about Macedon-armans they don’t know anything. These is not correct. I hope you will understand the problem and if have another questions I will be glad to reply you how clear I can . Right now, my english level is not so high. Thank you very much and all the best!!! (Njirlu (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC))
- Please stop adding the Vergina Sun and the term "Makedonji-armânji" to the pages about the Aromanians. The former is entirely unrelated, and the latter is a made-up term which is not used in real life. Constantine ✍ 08:46, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- The term is nou use in YOUR real life.All our institutions use thsese ethymologie !
- There are houndred of books edited in Balkans where is used yhese etymologie.
- Makedoni-armanji is the way how we call ourselves and is important to the others to know these.It is an official an pure etymologie for this ethnicity. So why you cancelled my work?
- Verina sun is the symbol of this ethnicity in Greece and over the world.
- Please stop to cancell these modification because is a worthier one.(Njirlu (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC))
- I'll be glad to re-add them if you provide me with a few reliable sources that prove your claim. A Google search with "Makedonji-armânji" and variants comes up with less than 10 results, amongst them the pages in WP where you added the term. If the term were so ubiquitous, surely there'd be more, and especially in relevant bibliography. As for the Vergina Sun, it is variously claimed by the Greek Macedonians and the Slavic Macedonians, but nowhere is it associated with the Aromanians. So please either give some reliable sources or stop. Your edits have been continuously reverted not only by me but by other users, and you will be blocked if you carry on in this way. Constantine ✍ 09:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- I dont have so much time to explaine you every day these stupid problem. In fyrom live Albanians, Turks, Slavs, and Makedonji-armanji, by ethnical point of view.By national point of view they all are Macedonians FYROMIANS.In these country, official, the slavs have Fyromian sun whice represent for them the freedom, and Makedonji-armanjljii has Verginasun the symbol of ancient Macedonians,like all others institutions from all over the world: Serbia, France, australia, roumania, albania, bulgaria s.o. In greece are the same Makedonji-armanji, for example there are many families from both sides, Greece and romania. They are Makedonji-armanji(in their language ) from Greece and Makedonji-armanji from Romania and Makedonji-armanji from all over the world. Look on our council site and you will see.
- What we can do if the greeks and romanians dont stop these assimilation tendence.
- Northern province of greece, Makedonia has these Flag. There live know more than 1.5 milion Makedonji-armanji, provinces Epir, Thessaly, Makedonia, kavala, Thrakia.They are the same Makedonji-armanji from Romania, even if they are so called Aromani!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- You understand know? It is yet a sensible problem but with the help of our Beautiful Europe, it wiil be clarifies very sun.You ask for references.I, wrroten there one site, and some books writted by Makedonji-armanji from FYROM, GREECE, and ROMANIA. You you cancel my work? Justify your reason.
- What do you need more to accept the identity of Makedonji-armanji? From all countries...
- Fyromians had changed their sun, official. Why you are telling me that is the problem of Macedonians Slavs and Macedonians Greeks? you dont read the newspapers? The slavs had accepted official that they are Slavs FYROMIAN !!
- I hope you will stop these joke! Dont cancel somethink Real, amd Pure.I have Makedonji-armanji ethnicity and i hace the right to modify that untruths. You dont think so?
- That truths has negative affests to our community. thank you very much and all the best!! (Njirlu (talk) 10:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC))
- It is your right to self-identify as you see fit. It is not your right to go around changing the identity of hundreds of thousands of others in an encyclopedia article based solely on your personal beliefs. Please either provide sources for your claims or you will be reported. Constantine ✍ 10:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Man! Your are a mind criminal.You deeply want to do these. I told you that is officiallllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll !!
- What you dont undertstand? Look on our official council. You will see there where is official.Look before you cancel my work. Look to the houndreds books !!!!!!!
- All "makedonji-armanji"s agree these.You are nut? Go to Blakan states abd see. I add site, i add bibliography? What do you want more? Wiki dont ask for more in these case.Wy you ask for more? (Njirlu (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC))
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Insults such as "mind criminal" and "nut" are intolerable. — AdiJapan 13:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok.I apologise !! This will never happen again.But please dont cancel vergina.sun because that add respect all principles of wiki. Thank you, thank you very much !!(Njirlu (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC))
- I ask that you provide a reliable source for all this that you claim. You may say that it is "officialllllllllllllll", but you just saying so in the face of all evidence just doesn't make it correct. As for the site you added, it is not a reliable source, nor sufficient to prove anything. There are hundreds of sites that do not use the term "Makedonji-armanji" at all, which is completely absent from scholarship & relevant bibliography. If your advocacy group wants to claim its own POV, fine by me, but not here (or at least, not without some credible source showing that this is accepted by many more than the 20 guys depicted on the website). We have enough trouble with the Balkan articles as it is. Constantine ✍ 15:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
How Aromanians call themselves edit
Here is a list of Aromanian societies and organizations: This is to show that the name Makedonji-armanji is not used by "all", as you say, and certainly is far from being "official".
- Sutsata "Armanjlji dit Albani"
- Association des Français Aroumains
- Sutsata Vlahilor/Armanjilor di Shtiintsa ditu Gârtsii
- Sutsata Vlahilor/Armanjilor di Veria
- Uniunea trã Limba shi Cultura Armãnã
- Tinira Armaname ali Machedonii
- Comuna Armaneasca "Fratslji Manaki" - Bituli
- Uniea ti Cultura-a armanjlor dit Machidunii
- Uniea Humanitara-Armaneasca - Lutsita Sta-Marii
- Sutsata Italicheasca-Armaneasca ti colaboratsii culturala
- Liga a Armanjlor
- Sutsata di poets armanj di Skopje
- Sutsata a muljerilor armani ditu Machedonii-Skopia
- Sutsata Culturala Aromana
- Organizatsia Tinirlor Armanj dit Romania
- Sutsata Armanjlor di Sofia
- Sutsata Armanjlor di Dupnitza
- Sutsata Armanjlor di Peshtera
- Sutsata Armanjlor di Veligrad
- Vlach Association of Australia
- Macedo-armanj Community of Australia
So there is indeed an Aromanian society in Australia using a name similar to Makedonji-armanji. I listened today to their improvised radio station and the guy there did indeed use that name. But in my view this is at most a small minority compared to the rest of the Aromanians, and more probably it's just a group of few people who set out to change the name of all Aromanians.
You said that "All ours institutions use these name". But the list above makes me think that you may have been lying. Makes me wonder how much I can trust what you say.
Now, was I right that you had an agenda? Is it not a propaganda this POV pushing that you have been doing? And it's not just here on the English Wikipedia, but also on the Romanian, French, Spanish and Italian Wikipedia (from what I know, but could be others too).
Aromanians are a really nice people. But I'm afraid your actions will hurt the good image they have. — AdiJapan 15:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for explications. I really appreciate this. I have nothing to say now.I am convinced that my ethnicity is 'aromân'. That.s nothing to tell. I.ve lied you when i told that all our organisations use that name.I really didn.t know that are so many armanji organisations.When i told you that, i was reffering at only 2. But thank you cause announced me all our organizations.I will contact them. And can you tell me Mister AdiJapan wy you cancel etimology 'Makedon-arman' from 'native name section' .Which principle of wiki gives you these right? In general, all my best!!
(Njirlu (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC))
- For starters, nobody really cares how you personally identify, but that has absolutely no bearing on what we're discussing here. The issue here is that you're imposing this terminology you prefer (which does not exist in English, and and which you misspell even in its Aromanian rendition by not including any diacritic).
- Above, you also ask: "Which principle of wiki gives you [this] right?" - as in, "the right of removing those additions". There are plenty core principles of wikipedia, which I understand you have not yet bothered reading. Let's review them together: WP:NOT, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:FRINGE.
- Additionally: you persistently conflate two arguments into one. On one hand, you ask us and wikipedia to include your agenda and original research into its articles. On the other, you claim that not doing so is an assault on the Aromanian right of self-identification. Let me assure you one more time: it's not. In general, I don't give a damn about how Aromanians chose to identify themselves, be it as an ethnicity or a subgroup - it's not for me or another wikipedia to decide, it's an open debate, and the assessment belongs not to activists, but to scholars. In particular, I do find it moronic that [some] Romanians and [some] Aromanians themselves have decided that Aromanians are nothing other than Romanian, just like I find it absurd to see the same has happened in Greece, Albania, Bulgaria etc. But that, I trust you see, has nothing to do with how wikipedia works. Your persistence to inform yourself on that, your blatant disregard for wikipedia rules, and in fact even your persistence of contributing to wikipedia branches in languages you can barely speak, make your edits a serious form of disruption. Based on that judgment alone, I won't hesitate to take all necessary actions to see your account blocked if you continue in this manner.
- Also, I cannot help but detect a threat of an organized action affecting wikipedia pages. Please read our WP:COI policy, and understand that this can't possibly be tolerated, and will result in the blocking of your account and any other. It's still unclear to me exactly what you mean, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that one.
- One more thing, Njirlu: you are now engaged in a revert war with several editors, on several pages, persistently reverting to your version despite obvious lack of consensus. This too is a blockable offense. See WP:EW and WP:3RR. Now, the practice is not to block new users who have not been familiarized with these rules over having failed to respect them. Consider yourself familiarized with them, and behave accordingly. Dahn (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
WP:ANI Notice edit
Hello, Njirlu. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WP:ANI regarding your edits in Aromanian-related articles. The thread is User Njirlu. Thank you. --Constantine ✍ 15:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009 edit
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I really dont understand why operator adyjapan and others are deleting a native ethimology used by "aromanians". is about "Makedonji-armânji". Iţve added this at "native name sectin" where we can find also "armanji" "rramanji". I considered that is corect to find there this original and pure native ethimology.So who can tell why adijapan delete this ethimology from wiki en, wiki.fr and wiki.ro? Besides, adyjapan it will more important that you add all informations we can find about aromanians on wiki.en, to wiki.ro; that article from wiki.ro about aromanians is a garbage. Thank you very much! (Njirlu (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The problem with your editing has been explained at some length, both here and at WP:AN/I. Clearly, as you have not yet understood these explanations an unblock is not appropriate. Please read the explanations given to you while this block is in force, as failure to understand them and act on them may result in longer blocks being considered. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 13:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Here we go again edit
I see you are back to the usual. If you have anything constructive to add to these articles, you are free and welcome to do so. The repetitive re-addition of a questionable, unsupported by reliable sources and POV-specific designation however will get you blocked again. Please do not continue in this way. Constantine ✍ 12:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
denumire nativa idiotule, ignorantuleeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(Njirlu (talk) 17:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC))
(Njirlu (talk) 17:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC))
- securist blestemat adijapan!!!
- va bateti joc...
- am adaugat nume nativ prostuleee!! si uite-te pe eurominority la harta si o sa vezi idiotule ca acolo scrie 2500.000!!! de ce stergi aceste informatii corecte?
De ignorant ce esti!! Cretinuleee!!! unde iti este deontologia?? escroculeee!!!(Njirlu (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC))
- o sa-ti dai seama cat de prost esti cat de curand!!! comunistuleeeeeeeeeeeee!!!
(Njirlu (talk) 17:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC))
- This is way beyond civilized dialogue. Stop and read Wikipedia:No personal attacks. — AdiJapan 17:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Iti reamintesc Adijapan ca esti un functionar public si ca trebuie sa fi impartial. Si ceea ce faci tu este o incalcare a acestui principiu, si mai mult decat atat observ o atitudine agresiva asupra unor denimiri native!! Daca nu esti prost, vei intelege ce spun eu acum. Opreste-te la timp!!
- (Njirlu (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) nu uita ca wiki nu este o taraba unde sa asezi tu, cretinule, rosiile dintr-un loc in altul! (Njirlu (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Hello, Njirlu. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 08:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Mister adijapan is deleted bibilography, external links and native native name of aromanians, macedon-armans. Why he did these?(Njirlu (talk) 09:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- Romania cant accept that aromanians are Macedon-armans, macedonians romanized who have a distinguished language and ethnicity???? (Njirlu (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- Adijapan since 3 months ago delete bibilography, external links and native name Makedonji-armanji!! Why???????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- at section native name we can find armanji and rramanji. But is not complete. They call themselves makedonji-armanji. A gave some oficial links for these and beside we must repect self-determination! But adi japan dont want these???? Why???? these is a propaganda of Romania since 150 years, and a genocide to Macedon-armans ethnicity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Look at recommendation 1333! europe reconigse us!! On eurominority.org on the map of minorities we can see 2.500.000 aromanians!!!! But adijapan dont accept these number!!!! why???? (Njirlu (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- Which principle of wikipedia.en does not respect the ethymologie "Makedonji-armanji"?? It is a native name and is corect to appear at "Native Name section"!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- why adijapan delete these ethymologie constantly????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- These is the attitude of an operator??? (Njirlu (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- He blocked me on wiki.ro for a month only because i add a native name!!!
- And he wants to do these on wiki.en !! Is not corect!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- I repet: adijapan delete bibiography, external links and native name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- Wich principle i do not respect???????????????????????????????????????????????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Blocked edit
I've blocked you for a period of one month due to your long-term disruptive behaviour, including personal attacks, threats, and non-cooperative editing style. Please do read and understand the relevant policies, including WP:No personal attacks, WP:Disruptive editing, and WP:CIVIL. --Aqwis (talk) 09:40, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Romanian operator adijapan does not accept a native ethimologie of Macedon-armans, aromanians. He delete bibiography, external links and a native name at section "native name"}} (Njirlu (talk) 10:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Romanian operator adijapan does not accept a native ethimologie of Macedon-armans, aromanians. He delete bibiography, external links and a native name at section "native name"
Decline reason:
Continuing your dispute here is not a good reason to unblock. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(Njirlu (talk) 10:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Mister adijapan is deleted bibilography, external links and native native name of aromanians, macedon-armans. Why he did these?(Njirlu (talk) 09:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Romania cant accept that aromanians are Macedon-armans, macedonians romanized who have a distinguished language and ethnicity???? (Njirlu (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Adijapan since 3 months ago delete bibilography, external links and native name Makedonji-armanji!! Why???????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) at section native name we can find armanji and rramanji. But is not complete. They call themselves makedonji-armanji. A gave some oficial links for these and beside we must repect self-determination! But adi japan dont want these???? Why???? these is a propaganda of Romania since 150 years, and a genocide to Macedon-armans ethnicity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Look at recommendation 1333! europe reconigse us!! On eurominority.org on the map of minorities we can see 2.500.000 aromanians!!!! But adijapan dont accept these number!!!! why???? (Njirlu (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Which principle of wikipedia.en does not respect the ethymologie "Makedonji-armanji"?? It is a native name and is corect to appear at "Native Name section"!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) why adijapan delete these ethymologie constantly????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) These is the attitude of an operator??? (Njirlu (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) He blocked me on wiki.ro for a month only because i add a native name!!! And he wants to do these on wiki.en !! Is not corect!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) I repet: adijapan delete bibiography, external links and native name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Wich principle i do not respect???????????????????????????????????????????????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2009
Decline reason:
You are not blocked for the views you hold; you are blocked for persistently edit-warring. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Mister adijapan is deleted bibilography, external links and native native name of aromanians, macedon-armans. Why he did these?(Njirlu (talk) 09:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Romania cant accept that aromanians are Macedon-armans, macedonians romanized who have a distinguished language and ethnicity???? (Njirlu (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Adijapan since 3 months ago delete bibilography, external links and native name Makedonji-armanji!! Why???????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) at section native name we can find armanji and rramanji. But is not complete. They call themselves makedonji-armanji. A gave some oficial links for these and beside we must repect self-determination! But adi japan dont want these???? Why???? these is a propaganda of Romania since 150 years, and a genocide to Macedon-armans ethnicity!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Look at recommendation 1333! europe reconigse us!! On eurominority.org on the map of minorities we can see 2.500.000 aromanians!!!! But adijapan dont accept these number!!!! why???? (Njirlu (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Which principle of wikipedia.en does not respect the ethymologie "Makedonji-armanji"?? It is a native name and is corect to appear at "Native Name section"!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) why adijapan delete these ethymologie constantly????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) These is the attitude of an operator??? (Njirlu (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) He blocked me on wiki.ro for a month only because i add a native name!!! And he wants to do these on wiki.en !! Is not corect!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) I repet: adijapan delete bibiography, external links and native name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Njirlu (talk) 09:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)) Wich principle i do not respect???????????????????????????????????????????????? (Njirlu (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2009
Decline reason:
You are bringing your ongoing content dispute into your unblock requests, which is quite the wrong way to do it. You are blocked for edit-warring, as you have been before. To get unblocked you will need to demonstrate that you understand what you have done wrong, and give us some reason to believe that you will stop doing it. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|AdiJapan delete bibliography, external links, and native name of aromanians, "makedonji-armanji"}}
- OK. What is wrong? To add a native name is wrong? all my best! (Njirlu (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
- Man please... what persissting edit warrings? I only add a native name! at section "native name". But operator Romanian adijapan dont want to accept these!! (Njirlu (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I only added a native name! But adijapan dont accept it!
Decline reason:
Not a request for unblock (and, as an aside, you don't need to use the {{unblock}} template to post on your talk page while blocked). You were blocked because you repeatedly inserted disputed information into an article. Whether your information (the native name) was correct or incorrect, or whether the article is better with (or without) it, is irrelevant. Once your edit was challenged, you should have discussed the issue on the article's talk page before adding it again. Instead, you continued to add the information, which is considered an edit war, and resulted in a block. In the future, discuss issues and reach a consensus, and you'll avoid this issue. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- OK .I understood now!! Thank you!
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understood the reason, please unblock me All the best!! (Njirlu (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC))
Decline reason:
I see no indication that you do. Page protected. Sandstein 06:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Warning edit
The why has been explained to you ad nauseum in this and other pages. You have been repeatedly blocked for the insertion of this very POV material, relying on the same, non-reliable and non-neutral source. If you can't understand that, I can't help you. And the next time you call me a Nazi I will take you to ANI. Constantine ✍ 07:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- As I said, it has been explained to you over and over. In short, you have not provided credible evidence that what you add are indeed native names, and your claim that the Aromanians self-declare as "Macedonians" is dubious in the extreme and reeks of fringe POV-pushing. Go through your talk page again, you'll see the reasons explained in more detail. Constantine ✍ 07:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, that was there before you came along, and has remained uncontested for quite some time. For the term "macedo-romanians" specifically I have seen it used in English-language scholarship, whilst your terms are used only by the one site you keep pushing. Constantine ✍ 07:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Be also advised that if you continue to edit-war, you will be blocked again. Constantine ✍ 07:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Njirlu, if you can give reliable sources (i.e. scholarly books or major international organizations) that use your terms, I'll be happy to add them back into the article myself. So far, you have singularly failed to do so, providing only a very obscure website, whilst rambling incoherently and attacking other users. Consequently, your word alone doesn't carry much weight... Constantine ✍ 07:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'll say this one last time. Give me some sources that prove what you say, and it'll be all right. FYI, I know perfectly well what the Aromanians are, and I also know that the issue of their self-identification is far more complex than you try to present it.... Constantine ✍ 07:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- If you can, then by all means do so. However, the site is clearly an advocacy site, irrespective of whether it has had contacts with the CoE or not (and furthermore, such contacts do not constitute recognition or anything else). I strongly urge you to forget the council's site and find other sources. Constantine ✍ 07:47, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Where is "participatory status" mentioned? Do you even know what the Council of Europe is? Only sovereign states are actual members of it. If any group or organization has contact with it or its members to promote its agenda, that is a completely different thing. Constantine ✍ 07:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Well, if I judge by the fact that the term "makedonji-armanji" which you introduced has less than 120 hits on Google, many of which are wiki clones, then no, I cannot regard your site as reliable, no matter whom it claims to represent. And "MAcedonians" alone has never until now been claimed for the Aromanian people as a whole. "Macedo-Romanians" is descriptive, since Aromanians are those Romanian-related (according to one view) peoples who live in Macedonia, but that is a different thing entirely. To claim the label "Macedonians" without qualifiers opens a totally different can of worms: the Macedonia naming dispute. Constantine ✍ 08:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, if there are hundreds of books, why don't you name me a couple? A search in Google Books turns up exactly nothing. As long as that term (and the Aromanian equivalents) are not verified by third party, neutral sources, I will remove them. Constantine ✍ 08:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- I am sick and tired of repeating myself. These terms do not appear to be used by anyone other than you. No citations, no books, not even Google hits. Either provide them or stop reverting the article. The next time you do that I will file a request for sanctions at WP:ANI. Constantine ✍ 11:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Really now... "Armin" as an ethonym: [1]& [2], and that is after 2 seconds of search. I do not know what your problem with these terms is, but unlike your pet terms, they are actually referenced in scholarly works. As to who I am, thanks for reminding me. Constantine ✍ 11:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
WP:ANI notice edit
Hello, Njirlu. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Constantine ✍ 12:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Block edit
--Cúchullain t/c 16:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am blocked only cause I add Native Names of Aromanians?
Decline reason:
You're blocked because you were edit warring on an article subject to discretionary sanctions, as clearly seen here. Let's not go through the same discussion you had the last time you were blocked. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
MacedonArman people edit
- Why you dont want to put native names "makedonji-armanji and makedonji-rramanji" at native name section? I am makedon-arman(aromanian) and these is the unique Native Ethimology. We dont have in our language the term "vlasi or macedo-roumanians ! We are only ARMANJI/Rramanji and MAKEDONJI (macedonians)! Why you cant accept a native ethimologie? (Njirlu (talk) 17:51, 3 December 2009 (UTC))
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is not my edit war!! Romanian and Greek operators constantly delete NATIVE NAMES of AROMANIANS! Is their war! Wikipedia cant accept the native ethymologie "Makedonji" ? why?
Decline reason:
No reason for unblock given. If you continue to post spurious unblock requests, your ability to edit this page will be removed. TNXMan 18:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Since there seems to be some confusion over what "Edit Warring" is, I point to Wikipedia:Edit warring. Perhaps this will help matters...? 159.182.1.4 (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
ANI notice edit
Hello, Njirlu. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hello Secret. A am operator njirlu, and i dont understand why you blocked me for indefinite time.
I am aromanian/macedon-arman/vlach/ and I only added the native names of my people event that name reprezent a problem for Romanian and Greek operators! Please take account that in balkans is still a problem with discrimination to my people. I added a book for the term Macedo-Vlachs and one operator has deleted. Why?? Because probably was Romanian. On wiki.ro they do naot accept the native names of macedon-armans. You can look on our council site to see these native names.(www.makedonarman-council.org). This council has Participatory Status at Council of Europe and I believe in the Balkan ethnic situation, might be a relevant prouve for 2 real native names! Please unblock me. For the mistakes i did it till now, i was blocked at that time. In not fair to block me for indefinte time, because of Romanian/Greek rasists operators. My native name must have place at article Aromanians. Please... (Njirlu (talk) 11:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC))
Njirlu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your reason here
Decline reason:
No reason given, and this is the last one. You were warned we would protect this page if you kept doing this; you kept doing this and we're protecting the page. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.