Nisithdash123
Hi. There are a few problems with the article, the first ones being a lack of reputable third-party references and the overall tone which is somewhat promotional. Next is what I assume by your message to be your personal involvement, making it a coflict of interest. It sounds like a very ambitious project, but without the verifiable references and with the promotional tone intact, it simply can't be included. However, if you can show some links to major press coverage on the project and keep the tone neutral per the above link, then yes, it's eligible. Hope this helps; I'll go one step further and create a user subpage on which you can work at your leisure. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK, here you go:
The original text is contained within the body. When it's ready, simply paste it back to CuseCar. Sounds like a great project, BTW. Interesting stuff. Good luck! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
March 2010 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Karthik Calling Karthik has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 20:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
This edit deleted sourced content and you performed the edit without using an edit summary. Please aim your abilities toward more constructive tasks. Your editing is becoming disruptive. Regards Tiderolls 20:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)