{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)- Sir,
- Please unblock my account . I wrongly did spamming for my website , but it did more harm to my website . Today I understand the importance of Wikipedia in my life . I humbly request to remove the blockade f my account . I assure you that this will not happen again in the future .
- With Regards
- Nirmalya Sikdar Nirmalyasikdar (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Nirmalyasikdar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry for doing this . I assure you that I will not do it in future . Nirmalyasikdar (talk) 16:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nirmalyasikdar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that I have done wrong by spamming wikipedia with my website link . I will not continue to cause damage or disruption in future . I will never spam wikipedia again in future . Instead I will make useful contributions to wikipedia in future .Nirmalyasikdar (talk) 16:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- What constructive contributions do you intend to make if unblocked? TonyBallioni do you have any other concerns about this block? 331dot (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 331dot I'm obviously not Tony or an admin but this account did nothing more than spam a website over the course of 2 years. Four of their five edits (aside from this request) were spamming their nonsense. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oh,yes-- we know you won't. Oh! you mean if unblocked. Hah. What indeed will you do instead? Be as specific as you can be. Take as long as you need. We are in no hurry at all. Should probably add his website to the blacklist to be sure.--Dlohcierekim (talk)
- (edit conflict) I personally find it hard to believe someone who has only ever edited to add one specific spam link over multiple years intends to do something else. I’m fine with another admin unblocking though if they’re convinced that the user will stop. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)