NinjaWolfHybrid

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vladimir Terziski (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vladimir Terziski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, NinjaWolfHybrid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vladimir Terziski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Vladimir Terziski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Email

While I have received your email, there was nothing in it requiring private communication. If you would like to discuss the matter in question, please either reply here (I will keep it on watch), or contact me on my talk page. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 11:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Yeah it wasn't advertising and we both know it. NinjaWolfHybrid (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Well, had I "known" that, I wouldn't have deleted it as such. It was basically standard CV/"profile" spam, and the only "source" was some anonymous conspiracy-theory page that goes on about "the Illuminati" and "the New World Order"; not exactly in keeping with a reliable source. In order to be a suitable subject for an article, the subject must have a substantial quantity of reliable, independent reference material available about it. If not, it is not notable and we should not have an article about it. If a good quantity of reliable and independent reference material is available about this individual, write an article citing those sources, sticking only to facts confirmed by them (and leave out the conspiracy theorizing "sources"). If not, you will need to write about them in a more appropriate venue, such as social media or a website set up for that purpose. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 12:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)