Hello, Nikolamilevski! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NikoSilver 21:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hello edit

Please do not move (rename) pages, as you did in Accession of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the European Union, to unsourced titles, especially when there are relevant guidelines in effect, and when there's a move discussion underway on the talkpage. Your full contributions list comprises of relevant repeated moves, which evidently suggests you're not a new user. Move-warring is harmful, especially in controversial issues such as the ones in question, and it is well-covered by the WP:3RR rule, which you are about to break. Your actions can also be regarded as a WP:POINT violation. NikoSilver 21:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Accession of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the European Union, you will be blocked from editing. ·ΚέκρωΨ· (talk) 20:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
The Burushaski-Balkans connection doesn't qualify for the language article, so it shouldn't been in the ethnic Burusho article. And anyway, Burushaski has been studied by Europeans for centuries, so any IE connection would have been noticed by now. Such claims need to be accepted in the field before we start including them here. kwami (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi again,
I didn't mind the Macedonian connection to Burusho as long as both sides were presented. However, there are two Macedonian editors who insist on removing one side, claiming that presenting both sides in the FT article is somehow unbalanced. The last editor to do this said that presenting neither would also be acceptable. Since a balanced presentation is not acceptable to these two, and an unbalanced presentation is not acceptable to Wikipedia, the third choice is neither side. This fringe material really is irrelevant to the article anyway, as other editors have said. It's a matter of Macedonian politics. If anything, it belongs at Republic of Macedonia. kwami (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply