User talk:NikoSilver/Signature shop/ProhibitOnions
Latest comment: 17 years ago by ProhibitOnions
Parts of discussion copied from his talk...
Also, I made you a nice signature in my Signature Shop. Feel free to use it/dump it:
Regards
NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 09:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Like it! Thanks, I'll plug this in right away! Regards, ProhibitOnions 10:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Anyway ... Here goes: ProhibitOnions (T) 11:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)...wow!
- Nah, I didn't think so either, but it does take time for the admins to look this stuff up before they come to the same conclusion, and I guess that's what happened. Regards, ProhibitOnions (T) 13:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC) and again! ProhibitOnions (T) 13:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC) one more time! ProhibitOnions (T) 13:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
And here's the updated model for 2007: ProhibitOnions (T) 14:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow! Minimal, yet ...smelly! I like it very much! Mind if I try to shorten it a little?
- Just a few code tricks I picked up on they way. It's now 289 chars long, from 344 that it used to be, all that without any change in appearance! Now if you want to shorten it even further, we can reduce the fading stripes like this:
- That's even shorter (down to 251 chars) and the change is unnoticeable. You could also create User:PO (note: log in separately and create new account) and then redirect both userpage and talkpage to the respective yours. That would shorten it another 24 characters (down to 227)! NikoSilver (Don't let the fact that I reduced my sig to the absolute minimum make you think I don't endorse formatted sigs -it's just a temporary idea I had. You'll probably notice me come back with a much more formatted one later...) 15:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Let's try it: ProhibitOnions (T) Yep. you're right, better and smaller. I like the narrower underline. The reason I fiddled with it at all was the discussion on Wikipedia talk:Sign your posts on talk pages about background colors. So I turned the background color into a foreground color instead. And PO's not a bad idea, just to stop anyone else from using it... Regards, ProhibitOnions (T) 20:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)