NickBarker123444431

NickBarker123444431, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NickBarker123444431! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Post (radio presenter) (February 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 07:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Post (radio presenter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Post (radio presenter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Post (radio presenter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 23:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Post (radio presenter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Post (radio presenter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Post (radio presenter) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

July 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gladys Berejiklian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 05:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)