Ngati Kahu

June 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. United States Man (talk) 00:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. United States Man (talk) 00:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Re:Article entitled "Margaret Mutu"

Your problem is that you have removed references and other parts of the page, not really improving anything at all. If you want to change something, you will need to provide a reliable source. Even if you know the person and the information is correct, you must have appropriate sources. United States Man (talk) 01:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding. I will look at it. You may want to watch the talk page as I will start an RfC. United States Man (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

In further reply - No, she has no control over getting her article removed. If she wishes to nominate it for deletion through the normal processes, she can do such, but she has absolutely no more power than United States Man or I do in deleting it. If you can tell me where it's a "direct attack on the person named" I can fix it, but I don't see where you're talking about. Please be aware that just including negative information is not a violation of neutrality, nor does it make it an attack article. Charmlet (talk) 02:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)