Notability of Nicholas F. Benton

edit

A tag has been placed on Nicholas F. Benton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -WarthogDemon 01:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007

edit

  You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Nicholas F. Benton. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Life, Liberty, Property 01:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I declined to delete the article via speedy for notability since asserting one is editor of a newspaper is at least an assertion of notability, , but someone is quite likely to delete it as self-advertising unless you fix up the tone, and get some references from other publications about your notability. I advise you to do it pretty fast. DGG (talk) 21:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nicholas F. Benton

edit
 

The article Nicholas F. Benton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject has apparently requested deletion; see this section of the talk page. BLP allows this where the issues are inherently contentious, as they seem to be in this case.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 08:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply