Bonny Hicks GA review

edit

Greetings, Newenehpets. I've left some remarks at Talk:Bonny Hicks/GA1 concerning the opening sections of the article. You can reply there point-by-point or all at once, whichever suits. I'll follow up on the rest of the article, pace dependent on how you want to handle these initial issues. Best, Skomorokh 05:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Newenehpets, it's been a while since I opened the review and you have yet to comment. Are you still interested in bringing this article to GA status? If not, I can close the review, no worries. Regards, Skomorokh 20:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, am seeking the time to do so. Newenehpets (talk) 08:58, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Georgy Girl (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Georgy Girl (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The two Georgy Girl articles both have (xxx) distinguishing words to identify them from each other.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 22:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Wikify invitation

edit

Orphaned non-free image File:Green-party-usa-logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Green-party-usa-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cut-and-paste move

edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give B Corporation (certification) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Benefit corporation. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Brycehughes (talk) 00:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonny-hicks-1990.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bonny-hicks-1990.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonny-hicks-1992.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bonny-hicks-1992.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonny-hicks-go-mag-1987.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Bonny-hicks-go-mag-1987.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue-walleye.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Blue-walleye.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Abortion in Insular areas of the United States has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:Abortion in Insular areas of the United States, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. feminist (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply