Newdefinitions108

This is Newdefinitions108's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Conversational journaling (June 9)

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Conversational journaling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Newdefinitions108! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't an article be suggested to merge this into since you are claiming the references are not notable enough? I have seen articles with less. This is a new phrase, do you need tech blogs to write about it before it's accepted? Newdefinitions108 (talk) 16:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Conversational journaling

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Newdefinitions108. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conversational journaling, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Conversational journaling

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Newdefinitions108. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Conversational journaling".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic