Nevets02

November 2013

Hello, I'm CanadianLinuxUser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Vine, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vine with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:CanadianLinuxUser with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 19:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  – Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nevets02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made a decidedly non-destructive edit on the "Vine" page. It was removed because it "did not appear constructive". Thinking that the editor was just a bot, I re-edited it. The same person undid it again, sending me a notification calling it "vandalism". I asked him to please stop using one of the standard templates, and he sent me one back. I requested a block, but I was blocked instead.

Decline reason:

If you think your edits are constructive, then you clearly lack the competence to edit Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Review

Apparently, you lack the sense of justice to administrate Wikipedia. I report someone who has repeatedly vandalized peoples' posts, and I get banned instead. If all administrators are like this, then I guess I will have to edit anonymously. Nevets out.