Neveryou

I didn't know that only ETA could be the legitimicer of their own killings.

ETA

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm contributing, but you have a POV and you think your POV is the standard. You can ban me all you want it will only reflect your totalitarian possitions

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Not only a fascist but also a power abusing coward

There is a discussion on Talk:ETA which explains why your edits are unacceptable, please contribute there. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 00:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

More menaces against freedom of expression.You are such a little policeman :P--Neveryou (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

The recent edit you made to Talk:ETA constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg^⊕⊗ 00:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC))

What vandalism are you talking about? Woah Wikipedia is becoming Goebbels dream--Neveryou (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks--Neveryou (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to ETA. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sceptre ^(talk) 00:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

What vandalism?! I just edited!!--Neveryou (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to ETA, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)