Neumu1

Addicted to Noise

Hi Neumu, thank you for your work on Addicted to Noise. Following your recent edits there, can I ask you whether you are in any way affiliated or connected with ATN or Michael Goldberg? If that is the case, please note Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guidelines and be aware that Wikipedia is not a place for advocacy. (Also, if you are Michael Goldberg, I admire your work!) Thank you, Brycehughes (talk) 05:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)It's

Hi Bryce Hughes, Yes I am Michael Goldberg. That said, I've been a journalist for over 30 years. It's standard that if someone has created something, and you write about it, that you include what that person is now doing. I came up with every creative idea related to Addicted To Noise from the name to hiring Frank Kozik to do the original logo and art to conceptualizing what would be included in ATN and naming the columns and different areas of the site. I arranged for all interviews that ATN did and I personally conducted most of them. I could go on. If somebody actually goes to the ATN entry at Wikipedia, it is because they are interested in getting some info about what might as well have been called Michael Goldberg's Music Magazine. What I am currently doing, since it is in many ways so close to what I did with ATN, would be of interest to them and is relevant to an entry about ATN. Also, ATN was the first web music magazine, and as far as I know, it was the second magazine of any kind on the web (Hot wired beat me by a few weeks, as I recall). My idea to develop a web music magazine was innovative and unprecedented at the time. I got awards from Yahoo and others for ATN, and as you know, Newsweek included me as one of 50 influential people in digital media, calling me an "internet visionary." Pitchfork, Stereogum and all the other music blogs were influenced directly or indirectly by what I did with Addicted To Noise. So what I'm doing now is relevant and would be of interest to someone going to the Addicted To Noise entry. Neumu1 (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Michael Goldberg Neumu1 (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Michael, I responded on the article's talk page, since we're now talking content specifics. Please see the discussion there. Thanks, Brycehughes (talk) 21:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD (October 18)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 08:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Neumu1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD

Hello Neumu1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DAYS OF THE CRAZY-WILD}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)