Ndwelsh

Welcome!

Hello, Ndwelsh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mass transforming into gravity, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 08:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mass transforming into gravity

A tag has been placed on Mass transforming into gravity, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The page is to promote the author's notions and Facebook page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 08:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk pages

Hi! As a general convention, when posting to a user's Talk page, add content at the bottom. I have moved your contribution to the bottom of my page and replied there. In general, before embarking on large-scale edits to Wikipedia or creating new articles, it is wise to be familiar with Wikipedia's core principles. I strongly recommend studying them. Good luck! Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 09:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Why your article was deleted

The reason is Wikipedia's fundamental content policy WP:No original research. You wrote on the talk page: "I wanted to share very interesting research material based on brand new aproach to Physics" but, as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is not a place to publish new ideas. It is worth reading the whole of the No original research policy, but the gist of it is in the sentence: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

That links with the WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source".

The links in the Welcome message above will tell you more about Wikipedia and how you can contribute. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

—

Deleted article

Article wasn't finished, and you already deleted it. How come? --Ndwelsh (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

The reason is explained above. There is a sister project, Wikiversity, which does allow original research and could be a suitable place for you to post this material. JohnCD (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

"No original research material" sounds too scholar to me by some reason. New ideas are left non-grata? Thanks for answering.... welsh '2013 --Ndwelsh (talk) 01:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mass transforming into gravity

The article Mass transforming into gravity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure original research; Wikipedia is not here for propogation of unestablished, unnotable theory.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 12:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC) Nat Gertler (talk) 12:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

---

I was trying to explain that before, but to no avail. This is not "original" research, but rather compilation of knowledge picked from reputable sources, which includes usual Physics study books, college education, description for Laws of Nature (common knowledge), as well, various Internet sources, description of which will probably expand.

Yet, I'm surprised again seeing such neglecting attitude to one of my works, something that took years of analytical and observational experience.

Ndwelsh (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

...and I have explained above, to no avail, that your "compilation of knowledge picked from reputable sources" is indeed original research by our definition: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources." JohnCD (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

... "compilation of knowledge picked from reputable sources" is not "original research", but rather *compilation* of knowledge, gathered and analyzed as whole. Ndwelsh (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)----

Nomination of Mass transforming into gravity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mass transforming into gravity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass transforming into gravity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

• Apart from the other problems with your editing, please note that Wikipedia is not a medium for promoting or publicising anything, but your editing is entirely aimed at promoting your ideas. Administrators can block from editing anyone who persists in using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass transforming into gravity, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Attempts at disrupting discussions like that are not only childish and doomed to fail: they're also a quick route to being blocked or banned. Please take care and act more responsibly. You're welcome to argue for your article, but not to remove other people's comments. cyclopia^speak! 16:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)