User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Diagram of Suburban Chaos article

It's not showing as live with a search; is there some sort of "hold" that needs to be removed from the article? Please inform. Thanks, 8bitmonkey

I hate you

meanie

Mincom

Hi, You have moved the Mincom article but did not state where. I am unable to find any text relating to the Mincom article when searching on the term 'Mincom'. can you repair this? Mincom now requires a disambiguation page to link to both articles. Thanks Rimmeraj 05:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I split the company into an article called Mincom Ltd. That article seems to be gone, but I didn't delete it. NawlinWiki 14:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, Can you repair the damage? In particular we will need a disambiguation page so that any one looking for the company Mincom will be able to find the right article. Thanks Rimmeraj 05:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Changing Article Titles

Sorry about that, ill be more careful now, to change the article title of a book, just click move its right next to edit article on the top of the page and enter the new name, if you wanna be absolutly certain click on the links to amazon where the exact title can be verified. im sorry for any inconveniance ive caused you and thanks very much for helping. anything else? please let me know Qrc2006 02:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Diagram of Suburban Chaos Article

Thanks NawlinWiki, I will add details to the article to flesh it out and let you know when that's been done.

Latino Article

Hi! Would u mind keeping an eye on the Latino Article? It seems to be persistently vandalised by user henry mark.

Cheers!--Burgas00 18:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism at Jim Moran

Please don't vandalise the Jim Moran article. If you wish to experiment with Wikipedia, you may use the Sandbox. Thank you and good day. --StevenL 22:28, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

My bad. --StevenL 22:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Reverting Vandalism at Red Scare

When cleaning up vandalism, please make sure the version you revert to is clean. In this case there had been two vandal edits (by different users), and you only reverted the more recent one. Narge 16:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism, when?

NawlinWi,. I'm letting you know I have never vandalized any article or stubb, and that any editing done by me has for a long while been only that of correcting grammar or misspelled words. Although I should point out that the last edit I made was to the article on Bong, where someone else had vandalized the page with a link to pornography. If you by any means believe my actions to be that of vandalism, then I invite you to take a look at the history of the article and the link itself. -I b pip 23:4?, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

+After closer inspeciton I realized that I had forgotten to simply revert the page to a clean version. Although I had neglected to do this, I believe that your 'vandalism warning' was unwarranted and unnecessary. I'd like you to remove the warning if possible, I would but that in itself is considered vandalism. -I b pip 23:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

++I am officially confused about UTC now. Thankfully I have wikipedia to help!

Vandalism by 204.184.190.229

Nawlinwiki, thanks for your intervention with this pest. He has a long history of vandalism going back to at least 13:56, 20 October 2005 (on the Kirkwood, Missouri, page), maybe further. MayoPaul5 19:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

More Vandalism Talk

Nawlinwinksi or whatever the crap your name is, I believe that you are the true vandal. Other people on your talk page seem to agree. 206.169.23.30 21:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)Anonymous.

• Look at this user's contributions (and 4 blocks) and decide for yourself... NawlinWiki 21:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

NawlinWiki, thank you for correcting the vandalism on the Breast Implant page. And, I don't have to look at that user's contributions to tell he isn't helpful. His own language says it all.molly bloom 01:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

External Links Removed?

Would you mind letting me know why you removed all the resource links posted from 67.103.169.42. I think the posts were reverted last night around 9pm. The links are not commercial and do not link to a commercial site. The links I've posted send Wikipedia users to the site for one of the most respected not-for-profits in the country, the American Academy of Achievement. The site honors achievers from every corner of the world and features extensive resources. All of them include photo galleries, video interviews, achiever bios and profiles, as well as printed interviews. Each achiever has been inducted into the American Academy of Achievement as a member.

What steps do I need to take so that I can continue with adding resources and not be labelled a "spammer?" Also, how can I go about retrieving the links I've already added? I can contribute to the content if needed. 67.103.169.42 18:45, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Achievement Content/Links

Thank you for your input.

I would welcome the opportunity to add content to each of these sites for achievers.

Is there a possibility of adding a "famous quotes" section to each site, adding quotes featured in Academy of Achievement interviews? How would I do this in a technical sense?

To add a quotes section, would I have to obtain permission from the editor of each site? If so, how do I do this?

Also, by adding content, will I then be able to add the external links to the Academy? Would I have to limit them to just the interview and photo gallery links, or can I still link to the biography and profile pages as well?

I know this is a lot of questions, but I am new to this process and don't want to step on any toes.

The Achievement website is a great resource and would act as a valuable supplemental tool for people wanting to access additional information.

Thanks for your time.

Best,

Sara Berlin451 21:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic Trivia?

Please point me to where you found this phrase. I fail to see how the trivia I added to the Al Gore entry was unencyclopedic. In fact, it's a quite interesting and unique piece of trivia. Go ahead and make your case on Gore's talk page, so we can have this discussion in one place. --No Dodo 00:38, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Mandarin tiger

The correct way to deal with something like that is to revert back to the pre-blanked article. If the user is an ongoing vandal then you can leave a message at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. If I thought that the article would have met one of the speedy critera then I would have deleted right away rather than putting it in AfD. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism? eh

Well I'm sorry I Don't Know how to use this "Wikipedia" properly or how you use it!

I won't try and learn about it any longer then seen as i'm a "vandal".

thanks for being very unhelpful in not showing me how things are done.

tom (user was 172.201.101.170; vandalized Jimmy Wales)NawlinWiki 14:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know what vandalism is. i clearly have shown to be inadept at helping out in this wikipedia system and clearly said i would like someone to show me where to go to find some help. I also wanted to thank Mr Wales for his work here. The site has helped me get a bit of research in a recent paper of mine.

Clearly you are being illmannered and are not interested in helping but only name calling so I'll go find someone more useful. 172.201.101.170 14:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Template substitution

It is suggested that you subst warning messages on user talk pages, which I see you haven't been doing. Royboycrashfan 17:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

EvocativeIntrigue

Thanks for reverting my userpage!

EvocativeIntrigue 18:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

---

Thanks again: user is on 3rd warning, so if this continues I'll add him to the Admin attention page!

I checked back through my history, I removed vandalism he'd made on Allah, hence the vandalism I guess!

EvocativeIntrigue 18:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

---

Thanks again for reverting my userpage today: RC patrolling certainly opens your user page up to attack! EvocativeIntrigue 22:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Proposed event policy for Wikicalendar

I recently posted some ideas about developing criteria for what should and should not be listed on Wikicalendar events at the Wikicalendar's talk page. Since you're actively involved in this project, I thought I'd let you know so that you can comment or add more suggestions. Thanks :). Fabricationary 00:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

User:NawlinWiki

Just out of interest did you want your user page blanked? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I wasn't sure if it was you doing it while logged out. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Reverted interwiki

Excuse me, but why did you revert my interwiki link to the catalan wikipedia in the article Beech Marten? 80.102.126.201 (Oersted in ca-wiki)

Don't worry, I assure you it isn't ;-). It's just the catalan commom name for that animal (you can check it at the article ca:Fagina). I'll add the iw link again. 80.102.126.201 (Oersted in ca-wiki)

Subst

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. --Cyde Weys 01:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Heh, I just want to reiterate this, as I'm currently running a user talk template substitution bot and your name is coming up most often of any user. Just thought you should know. --Cyde Weys 02:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

et tu

thanks for covering my page. Anger22 19:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for so promtly reverting the vandalism on my talk page ([1]). IronChris | (talk) 22:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page[2] :-) Stu Hacking ^talk 10:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The Marshes

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from The Marshes, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. I disagree that this band is non-notable by the WP:MUSIC guideline. They have multiple records with Dr. Strange records (see [3]), which doesn't seem like a one-band label or vanity or anything like that. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Mangojuice^talk 03:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

no thank you's required

I owed you one. Cheers and take care! Anger22 19:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Akron Article

Thank you for diligently pursuing to rectify the objectionable material in Akron, Ohio. I must say I don't have much patience to do anything other than revert. Cheers! --UltraSkuzzi 21:22, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Special X

I went ahead and removed the template you put on the Special X page due to the fact that it is a notable radio channel. It is not totally defunct, and still is a hot topic among XM Satellite Radio subscribers.

That, and the fact that no one ever had a problem with keeping XM Liquid Metal's page on during the year it was off.--XMBRIAN 01:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Wow,

you are all over WP:AIV! Good work, you're catching a ton of vandalism. Incidentally, can I deduce from your username that you're from the Crescent City? I grew up there myself, and most of my family is still there. -- Deville (Talk) 14:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Ah, you're still there? I bet it is. I've been down there four or five times since Katrina (I live in NYC now) and it's a changed city. However, I have to say it's gotten a lot better over the last few months, that's for sure. You live in Orleans Parish? And, I got two words: Reggie. Bush. w00t. -- Deville (Talk) 14:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

BikeShare

Hi,

I wanted to let you know that I've removed the prod tag for this article. I've stated my reasoning on the article's talk page. I have no objection to taking it to AfD (I'll even post it if you'd like), but my opinion is that it's notable enough. If you change your mind and have no objection to keeping it, let me know and I'll go ahead and finish wikifying it. ScottW 00:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I'll see what I can do to clean it up and add in appropriate references. If I'm feeling ambitious enough, I may actually change the article into the general concept rather than the specific campus program. I have a few other things I'm working on, so it'll be a few days before I get to it, but I'll let you know when I'm done. ScottW 03:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

After looking into the topic a little more, I've proposed that this article be merged with list_of_community_bike_programs and redirected to Community_bicycle_program. See the article's talk page for details. ScottW 16:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Year of birth/deaths & living people

I saw you categorised the Jim Crowley and James Emanuel articles from bluebot's page. For articles about people, could you also add the year of birth and the year of death category. (category:xxxx births) and (xxxx deaths). And for living people, also add the category:Living people. Tnx. Btw, what an amazing amount of contributions you've done these last days/week. (was too lazy to check if it was months). Garion96 ^(talk) 22:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Many and many articles in there yes. See Category_talk:Living_people for interesting reading. Btw, *cough*. See The Pinhook Creek Troubador :) Garion96 ^(talk) 02:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry if I conflicted with your edits on Skinners' School. I was trying to target the same vandalism as you and inadvertently put it back! --Mike Straw 14:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

RE:Thanks

You're very welcome ;-) DGX 14:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Userpage vandal

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. :) -- Shizane ^talk_contribs 18:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Newark Express

All articles about Newark Express players, though not the cat, were created by User:Agc7528 in a coordinated effort. The fact that there's a cat for these people means nothing as to their satisfaction of WP:BIO! U.S. professional athletes who have competed only in the minor leagues, never professionally, are generally NN, unless they were college stars. You probably should not have removed prod on that basis alone. What do you think I should do? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 11:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin Wright. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 12:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism/personal attack made by that anon on my talk page. Happy editing!--– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 03:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Awesome job with all the rapid vandal reverts. Yaaaaaaay. Pretty cool. Keep it up. -- The Prophet Wizard of the Crayon Cake ^{Prophesize) 14:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Userpage vandalism

Thanks for the revert! Cheers -- Samir धर्म 14:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you as well! Kukini 15:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

AIV

Hi, WP:AIV is not the place to request a username change. You ought to take a look at this. If you need a hand setting up a RfC, I'll be happy to help. --Wisden17 15:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for catching the vandalism to my user page! :) RadioKirk talk to me 16:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

for reverting vandalism to my User Page. --Wisden17 16:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

216.162.80.17

I am sorry, but this IP is shared by several dozen computers at a boarding school near philadelphia. I am not the one doing the vandalism, and it is coming to me as a shock, as I regularly contribute legitimately to the Wikipedia. The vandalism must be caused by some other student.

sharedIPEDU confirmed, tagging talk page now. RadioKirk talk to me 16:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Tridium

You prodded Tridium a few days ago as a hoax. I've changed it into a redirect to Tritium. I think it's far more useful as a possible mis-spelling. Reyk _YO! 00:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Please do not subst the speedy deletion templates. Not substing results in better automatic deletion summaries for admins. Thank you, Kusma (討論) 20:22, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Motorex3

Sorry, AIV is for cases of very clear and blatant vandalism, and for users that need to be blocked after having been warned sufficiently (with a bv, test3, or test4).

I suggest telling him not to blank the AfD and instead add his thoughts to the AfD you are adding. I don't see sufficient warning in Motorex3's tak page, but in addition to using the test tags, you really should warn him that removing the AfD headers is the same as vandalism. --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

In any case, the article has been speedy-deleted as a hoax page, so you don't have to worry about tagging it for AfD anymore. If Motorex3 keeps recreating it, we'll do stuff like protect it from recreation. :-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 16:04, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Question

I was wondering why you gave User:KT4303 a "last warning" despite the fact that it was his first offense. no ({test1}}, ({test2}}, etc? See [4] Adambiswanger1 03:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

• I see, I see. Fair enough. Thanks. Adambiswanger1 03:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For your extremely heavy activity in reverting vandalism, as well as tireless categorization in the last fortnight.Blnguyen

I second this. I just wanted to give you this barnstar myself, cause you really have been working tirelessly on categorization and other dull but necessary stuff. Garion96 ^(talk) 21:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Concerning Vandalism to User:Mboverload

I don't think that was vandalism, merely frustration vented through letters on a user-talk page. I understand my acts on User:Storminnorman789, but I think User:Mboverload hasn't seen any vandalism on my part.

Porn image vandalism

Note that the result of this debate was User:Clever curmudgeon getting a 24 hour ban for repeatedly posting porn images on articles. NawlinWiki 22:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from vandalising and reverting the edits of other users' contributions, especially on this page: Alicia Alighatti 208.31.155.254 13:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Check the page history -- I don't think removing a porno picture counts as "vandalism". NawlinWiki 13:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

To anyone else who happens to read this - I can assure you that NawlinWiki was actually reverting the anonymous IP's vandalism. Do not consider this a real warning. --Bachrach44 14:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Any edit which is not designed to improve the quality of the encyclopedia is vandalism. WP:VAND Also includes "Uploading provocative images" under image vandalism. --Bachrach44 14:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

The edits do improve the quality of the encyclopedia by providing a screenshot of Alicia Alighatti in action, as many other pages on actors and movies do. It is not for you to decide whether or not the image should be deleted, only the rules of wikipedia can dictate that. Your peronsal grudges against deemable offensive images are irrelevent. If you cannot handle viewing the image, then do not go to that page (what do you expect on a porn actress's page?). There are thousands more offensive images on wikipedia that are not deleted and legitimately exist. Please give this image the same amount of opportunity and respect as any other. The intention is not to be purposely offensive, but as stated, to provide insight on Alicia Alighatti. Remember the three-revert rule, and cease reverting. Clever curmudgeon 19:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

You reverted an edit made by User:MniK adding more information to Alicia Alighatti. This is not the first user's edits that you have reverted so please refrain from further childish vandalism. Clever curmudgeon 19:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

You have reverted an edit that involved adding an image to the Aurora Snow page. Do not revert other users' edits again for no reason. Just because you find pornographic imagse offensive does not mean that they do not belong on wikipedia. The picture involves insight to Aurora Snow's filmography, and should be left where it is. Clever curmudgeon 19:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

I noticed you deleted an entire conversation on User talk:Bachrach44. Do not edit conversations that do not concern you and are not on your user talk page. Please left other users' talk pages alone and end your wave of childish vandalism. Clever curmudgeon 19:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Curriehill Primary School

had been prodded before - by me :). Please AfD it. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Gurch

Hi, thanks for the revert. I never liked bread anyway – Gurch 13:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Ben Franklin High School

Hi, I noticed you created this article and did most of the work on it. One line which struck me as kind of weird was "It is commonly referred to as "Ben Franklin" to distinguish it from Franklin High School in Franklin, Louisiana." It is true that it is commonly referred to as "Ben Franklin", no question, but sometimes I've heard people say "Franklin", but in any case I don't think there has been any confusion with Franklin, La. To be honest, I never heard of Franklin in my life until a few years ago when someone I knew moved there, and I would daresay that few New Orleanians have heard of it, and for even fewer would there be any confusion over the meaning of Franklin when discussing education. Just my two cents, though. -- Deville (Talk) 14:55, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Ain't My Bitch

Just to let you know, I deprodded this and moved it to AfD. There's a claim of notability in the article (though perhaps it was added after your prod). Mangojuice^talk 16:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Moved from userpage

Can't send you a message for some reason. Are the new changes to the England team article objective enough? My sincere apologies for editing your page, but no other method of send you a message.

Proposed speedying nn corporations

I went ahead and proposed this here. I'd appreciate any feedback/support/changes, etc. Recury 19:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I guess I took too long, looks like we are on the same page though... Recury 19:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Set Abominae

You can go ahead and merge now as you offered :) Cheers, Petros471 20:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Speedman =

• Please do better research before you list articles for deletion.

This was featured in black belt magazine. --Masssiveego 10:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• I stand by my votes for deletion -- in particular, searching for "Speedman" on the website of Black Belt magazine gets no results. NawlinWiki 11:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

It looks like a pattern of vandalism and trolling from my point of view. If you will not email the speedman page and verify it was published in many well establish magazine such as black belt magazine, nor look for other articles outside the internet such as telephoning black belt magazine , I believe you have not done any research and are just deleting for no good reason. Not everything is instantly published on the internet, better research should be conducted to verify your claims of non notability. Please refrain from editing in bad faith. --Masssiveego 06:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Torsten Frings

Second try is much better. Kingjeff 04:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Patent nonsense

Regarding the article Attack of the Twonkies (film), which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "patent nonsense", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because it is not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is either a random assortment of characters, such as qowe4i6t8uq309ugjlsakdwemgpo2q43rweuitykj, or words that are so confused that nobody could make sense of them, like "how read box blue yellow tissues water stone chicken". This article is about a film. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:PROD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 12:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Gurdwara

Thanks a lot for that - that a good idea and I agree with you. I am adding some more photos so I will do that at the new location. --Hari Singh 22:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion/ Felix Newton Pitt

I seem to not find any information than what I have. I am trying to find when he was born, when he died, and other accomplishments that he did. Thief Lord 18:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

I am trying to find a claim. Thief Lord 19:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC) P.S. will a picture work?

I just found some information. No picture was included but I found when he was born, when died, and other information Thief Lord 17:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Flippy... something

You'll be delighted to hear that, imo, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flippiperazine does come within a speedy criteria, specifically:

Very short articles providing little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion.

The expansion clause would be unlikely to apply here... in any case... <flush>... it's gone ;) Deizio talk 01:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, NawlinWiki! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael _{/ 19:34, 26 June 2006 (UTC)} 19:34, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Can you close out an AfD discussion?

It appears I acted too swiftly in one of my AfD submissions. I recanted my AfD for Theaxa and apologized to the author. Who can close this out for me (or can I do it myself)? --DarkAudit 21:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

No Problem!

No problem, fellow Vandalproof user HawkerTyphoon 20:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Finally settled them down

It took a bit, but the Haris Cizmic crowd have finally calmed down and come to their senses. In spite of the sockpuppetry, the changes he has made on the temp page version have me thisclose to withdrawing the nomination. If that had been the page in it's original form, I probably would have let it pass without comment. --DarkAudit 21:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Claim

As stated above I found some information such as when he was born, and when he died. I was hoping I could remove the delete tag? Thief Lord 13:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Shift (music)

I've rewritten the article... care to have another look? Grutness...wha? 04:34, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Spocks brain

Spocks brain has already been warned - see here for a list of her vandalism. Dev920 15:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Ok, cool - can you tell me whether spocks brain has now been blocked indefinitely or for a week? The block log says both. Dev920 21:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Irony

Isn't it ironic to vandalize the page on Vandalism? I did it as a joke to make the admins laugh. Sorry, man. --24.163.65.156 20:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

RE: Rush Limbaugh

I was attempting to revert the previous edit which actually was vandalism, however, due to the size of the article and an edit collision, it did not go... as planned. I have since restored the removed text. My sincerest apologies.

Signed, JJJJust 00:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Good work on the page. As I'm sure you've noticed, a few extremely ardent Limbaugh fans will tolerate nothing on the article page that paints Limbaugh in less than a flattering light. Some of these same editors are blanking the Palm Beach incident at will, and attempting to game the system on the Talk Page. Ah, well... we've seen this before. Despite what some are claiming, there is no consensus on the Talk page to remove the incident. Just some loud wailing. Eleemosynary 01:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

There's an RFC on the Talk page now, where people are voting as to whether to keep the airport detention incident in the article. You may want to stop by and vote. Eleemosynary 23:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks from KWUR

Thanks for the addition. We appreciate continued contact and interest from our DJs of the past!

Yes. Thanks you for your addition, I would love to hear more about U2/KWUR from 1980! JohnKlax 19:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC), current KWUR GM.

Re: Tokeville nonsense

I suspect sockpuppetry and have been blocking accordingly, see [5].

Sorry if you can't view that link. Here we have it:

• 01:40, July 7, 2006 . . Ryulong (Talk | contribs | block)
• 01:39, July 7, 2006 . . Ryulong (Talk | contribs | block)
• 00:56, July 7, 2006 . . Lost Goy (Talk | contribs | block) (redirectered)
• 17:48, July 5, 2006 . . Coolie O (Talk | contribs | block) (replaced deleted redirect)
• 05:44, June 14, 2006 . . Godwhacker (Talk | contribs | block) (Redirecting to Tokeville, Washington)
• 06:05, May 26, 2006 . . Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) (hoax?)
• 23:21, April 27, 2006 . . Dschor (Talk | contribs | block) (minor fixes)
• 22:35, April 27, 2006 . . Dschor (Talk | contribs | block) (will add more soon)

It appears quite obvious that the users re-creating a nearly identical stub are sockpuppets of banned user Dschor. — Jul. 7, '06 [16:45] <freak|talk>

Rochdale F.C. category

Have moved the players in that category to the Rochdale A.F.C. category where they should have been. May as well delete the category, but I don't know how to start the process. Markspearce 18:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venture the Void

Hi. Could you list the specific Wikipedia:Deletion policy criteria you believe the article meets, for the record, in the nomination? I am reasonably sure that the first comment's list is the same as what you intended, but it would help if you made them explicit. Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert 21:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for adding that to the nomination. Georgewilliamherbert 22:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

about KBIT FM

Hi, Nawlins. The problem with the article is that the station doesn't actually exist. Please note that it's has been listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KBIT FM. Please also note that it's the second radio station hoax article this editor has created. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KWLD -- Mikeblas 03:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

No worries. I just wanted to make sure you knew the whole story. -- Mikeblas 03:39, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Zidane

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog or an AP feed. As such, an image of Zidane receiving a red card is not notable enough to be inserted in the article, especially when there is only one other image of him (which is isolated in the infobox). One cannot reasonably expect to see an image of Zidane's headbutt when one does not see images of him at award's banquets when he is receiving FIFA Player of the Year honours or UEFA's Best Footballer of the Past 50 Years. One must put things in perspective. And by the way, the lead story is Italy's victory ;) hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 22:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Rory Demetrioff

Why would you deny people from Canada to have access to researching this individual. He appears on the government of Ontario and Government of Canada registry for active lobbyists. I think this needs to be opened up to a wider discussion. How can that take place. Also, it should be encouraged to review already public information on google and on the government of Ontario Integrity Commission website at: http://lobbyist.oico.on.ca/Integrity/RegistrationGeneral.nsf/PublicFramesWeb?OpenPage

Also, a number of collegues also have entries in Wikipedia including: Leslie Noble, Deb Hutton, Gerald Caplan, Ian Brodie, Rod Love

Why is this individual singled out? Perhaps he is not in the right category on wikipedia?

Thank you for your help and insight.

Oakville123 01:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Unprotect my page

You need to unprotect my page so I can edit out my warnings. I feel most of them were unjust and I don't like them on my page. Thank You.

Your edit to Quincy Jones

Your recent edit to Quincy Jones (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 15:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• I know, the article cuts off and I was trying to fix it. NawlinWiki 15:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

  I realized what you were trying to do and I think I have reverted to a full version. Let me know if you need any more help with this. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Glifted AfD

I have speedy reopened the Glifted AfD because CSD A7 appears to be invalid in this case - they satisfy WP:MUSIC as having members who were formerly from another notable group. Regards, Kimchi.sg 04:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

LowtaxNetwork

Why remove informational sites from informational webpages??? Will you please look at the links added and tell me they are not right for the subjects! Not advertising, we provide information for people just like wikipedia. Material is purely reference material!

• Taxation in the United States

LowtaxNetwork 14:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

--Response -- User is spamming and has been blocked for it once already. WP is WP:NOT a collection of links. NawlinWiki 14:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Get it right!!! LowtaxNetwork 14:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

I heard you the first time

Stop being a troll, I'll leave your precious articles alone if you leave me alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q'neas (talk • contribs)

Uncat

How come you removed the uncat template from Elizabeth Green the Stork Woman? Check out similar articles, they mostly have 5+ categories. 1 is hardly sufficient. Stevage 23:20, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

• My practice is to remove the uncat tag when there's even one category (other than birth and death years). Otherwise, it's too hard to know which items on the uncat list need work. NawlinWiki 23:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Mmm, not a good practice imho. The tag is there to say "this page needs more categories". Removing it is, well, totally unhelpful. Stevage 06:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

AFD

Hi! I've recently put the article Dub Piece up for deletion, on thr gorunds that it's non-notable, and most probably created by the same people who created the videos. I'd appreciate your vote on the matter, either way (of course), at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dub Piece. Thanks! HawkerTyphoon 02:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Never saw that before.

Sorry, I never saw that I could do that before, thanks for pointing that out.