NavalExpanse

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barneystimpleton for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 03:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Matt Bennett filmography

FYI, the filmography table you just re-added to Matt Bennett relates to a different Matthew Bennett. Please note the limited list of credits at the IMDB link which I have added to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article 1991 has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism and familiarize yourself with what we consider vandalism. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Why was this user not blocked as well, as an obvious sock of a blocked user? Beach drifter (talk) 05:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

ANI Notice

You are being discussed on the admin's noticeboard here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Arthur Rubin

For what it's worth, I agree that I do not meet WP:PROF, although others have asserted that I have. However, the claim is that I meet WP:BIO. Furthermore, your adding a {{notability}} tag which has been discussed, and consensus was found against, twice, does seem a bit WP:POINTy.

But it's wrong to assert that a {{notability}} tag cannot be removed. If you were to post an AfD, it would (probably) be wrong to remove it, unless you really are a sock of the blocked editor. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, how many sock puppets do you have? NavalExpanse (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

One acknowledged alternate account (3rdMouse, which I haven't used), and one reported to ArbComm, but only used on articles where I feel a risk for my personal safety. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Arthur Rubin is guilty of sock puppetry and he admitted it. Shame on you, Rubin! 202.57.48.69 (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)