Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenda Lynn Nelson-Porter (July 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C.Fred was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
C.Fred (talk) 02:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, NaturalResearch! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —C.Fred (talk) 02:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 Georgia Secretary of State election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The campaign page for Nelson-Porter makes no indication that she has entered the Republican primary for Secretary of State.C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Please cite a source for Nelson-Porter being on the Republican ballot in spring 2022. —C.Fred (talk) 03:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, NaturalResearch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Brenda Lynn Nelson-Porter, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. After reviewing Nelson-Porter's web site, your username indicates to me that, at the least, you have a conflict of interest.C.Fred (talk) 23:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello NaturalResearch. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to 2022 Georgia Secretary of State election, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NaturalResearch. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NaturalResearch|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Please declare your relationship to Nelson-Porter or her company.C.Fred (talk) 01:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Brenda Lynn Nelson-Porter

edit

  Hello, NaturalResearch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brenda Lynn Nelson-Porter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Brenda Lynn Nelson-Porter

edit
 

Hello, NaturalResearch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brenda Lynn Nelson-Porter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

2026 Lt. Gubernatorial election in Georgia moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to 2026 Lt. Gubernatorial election in Georgia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply