NativeEnglishman
October 2023 edit
Hello, I'm GMH Melbourne. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Indian massacre of 1622 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- The verbosity of this edit summary is a kind of signal. Drmies (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- I corrected an inaccurate narrative of a massacre. NativeEnglishman (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- How is rectifying incorrect information not constructive? NativeEnglishman (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian massacre of 1622. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Indian massacre of 1622. Drmies (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Can you advise if what part of the edit constitutes an inaccuracy or vandalism? NativeEnglishman (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Surely you can see that yourself. Drmies (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Surely you should be able to cite the inaccuracy; pending there ‘actually’ being one? NativeEnglishman (talk) 12:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Request a page move to change the name of the article before you changing the titles within the article. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 12:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Surely you should be able to cite the inaccuracy; pending there ‘actually’ being one? NativeEnglishman (talk) 12:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Surely you can see that yourself. Drmies (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)