July 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm JJMC89. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jack J. Yang, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 08:14, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jack J. Yang, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 08:28, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jack J. Yang. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Melcous (talk) 08:36, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. 2601:188:0:ABE6:D17A:C1A6:9EE9:F60F (talk) 08:41, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

How do u add sources to the page? Thanks NathanOrlando (talk) 08:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Jack J. Yang shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 08:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:3CF7:E4A2:6CC5:354F (talk) 09:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply