Natasha2006
Welcome to Wikipedia!!! edit
|
Edit Summary Request edit
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 22:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I believe I have summary for all of my edition. Please check again.--Natasha2006 17:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Alteon Training, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. If you have any questions or would like help with editing your article to make it more encyclopedic, just ask for help on my user page. I will be more than happy to awnser any questions you may have about why your article was nominated for deletion and how to fix it.--Redlock 16:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Airfoil-parts.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Airfoil-parts.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Copyright status of Northwest Airlines flight 1482 edit
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Northwest Airlines flight 1482. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19901203-1 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Northwest Airlines flight 1482 with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Northwest Airlines flight 1482 with a link to the details.
Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Northwest Airlines flight 1482 saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.
It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CIreland 20:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Tagging for categories edit
You added a category to runway incursion, but put a colon before the word "Category". That is not the way a category tag in an article is formatted. Also, please check the exact wording and capitalization of a category (I had to change "Air Safety" to "Air safety" for it to work) and its location (at the end of the article). Thanks for helping!--Orange Mike 15:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello there Natasha, I saw your test page with this title. It would probably be better for you if you drafted pages in your own user space, such as User:Natasha2006/Operational errors/Deviations for example. This is away from main space and you can edit to your heart's content without being bothered by people threatening to delete your work in progress! You can then transfer the article to main space once it's finished just by changing its name. Let me know if you need help with this, Best wishes, Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 14:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
I am an ex- Member of the ICAO Obstacle Clearance Panel (now renamed as the Instrument Flight Procedures Panel) and retired, but recruited as an adviser to another Panel Member.
This problem arose because ARINC 424 have 'stolen' the term "course" to define legs with undefined start or end points - the "Course to altitude (CA)" leg and the "Course to Fix (CF)" leg. These leg types arise on takeoff when the autopilot is not engaged until 400 ft, and the aircraft has already been affected by wind and speed changes. It means the aircraft flies in a specified direction from wherever it is when the autopilot is engaged.
It ws then decided to define "course", which is where all went wrong.
The real solution is for ARINC to change the term to something like UA and UF meaning "unspecified point to altitude/fix". However they are not receptive to this suggestion.
I suggest appropriate definitions for the three navigation terms could be:
Course. The projection on the earth’s surface of the theoretical path of an aircraft neglecting the effect of wind, the direction of which path at any point is expressed in degrees from North (true, magnetic or grid). See also “track” and “heading”.
Heading –The direction in which the longitudinal axis of an aircraft is pointed, usually expressed in degrees from North (true, magnetic, compass or grid). See also “course” and “track”.
Note. In navigation, winds are usually given in degrees true, therefore the heading to fly a desired track is usually the course adjusted for magnetic variation and compass correction (see also “course” and “track”)
Track –The projection on the earth’s surface of the path of an aircraft, the direction of which path at any point is usually expressed in degrees from North (true, magnetic or grid). See also “course” and “heading”.
The above definitions for heading and track from existing ICAO definitions. I have added the one for "course", the notes and the cross references.
There may be a need for another definition - the magenta line on the new glass cockpit displays - the "track made good", as opposed to just "track", which should then become "required track". However, the "course" is not the track made good, but that needs further explanation.
Any comments so far?
Robert from Canada (talk) 12:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)