Nakedwelsh

June 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Stalking, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please note that this subject has been discussed extensively on the article talk page at talk:Stalking, and the current content is a result of community consensus on the material. As a result, changes to that content should first gain consensus to support that change. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Stalking. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 18:40, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

There was no OR info in my post. You cannot have a section under stalking that covers Gang Stalking as simply a delusion of mental disturbed individuals as it is now. This is a real phenomenon on the rise and the mentioned section sites information that is 20 years old for a phenomenon that is only coming to climax in the past several years. There are reports from organizations like Fox News which are harder to find now due to large gang stalking groups scrubbing the info. Either way it is not right to cover Gang Stalking at all if it is simply going to be passed off as a mental condition. This is false and if there is an argument on how to cover it there should be NOTHING listed until it is sorted out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nakedwelsh (talk • contribs) 18:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC) As I stated on your talk page, this subject has been discussed extensively at talk:stalking, and the current sourced content is a result of consensus on that talk page. If you disagree with that consensus, talk:stalking is the place to bring up your concerns. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Barek with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk) 18:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

-Excuse me? Please stop your accusations of me disturbing anything. I simply placed a comment in the wrong place and removed it. Is that against policy? Nakedwelsh (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

You did Very Well

You did Very Well, You are Very Intelligent, and remained calm, . . .

You did everything right, and handeled these dangerous people excellently !~

Thank you for your help :

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Stalking, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
The material you are adding makes several claims and stated conclusions that are not supported by the source you are using. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Nakedwelsh, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Nakedwelsh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Mobbing

I've reverted your second and third edits to mobbing. While I don't have any particular objection to the "see also," your edits imply that Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace discusses gang stalking. Since the source discusses abusive behavior in the workplace and your edits to stalking are about abuse from strangers or near-strangers, I don't see an acceptable application of that source. In any case, you will need to check the cited source or provide your own source. Acroterion (talk) 01:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)