User talk:NaTaHu/sandbox

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Glibjibb

I think this article has potential, there is clearly a need for information about this new language so thats good. Since this is clearly the beginning of the article there isn't much to peer review. I would say just try to incorporate the sections you see in the articles for other languages i.e. History, Syntax, Memory management, Tools etc. Also Marvin suggested that you should add a "Hello World" example if you can. Other than that good start.

TeaglesCS (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review 2 Game Feel

edit

Major Points

edit
  • Needs sources still, but well written as a draft
  • Could discuss Flow, as it seems very tightly related. More could be said about game feel in relation to player skill, i.e. do games with better game feel have more potential for skilled play, such as Rocket League or Super Smash Bros? How does the game feel influence how people learn to play a game, and how the gameplay evolves with the player base?
  • It looks like you left them intentionally blank but make sure to say a lot more about Audio and Metaphor

Minor Points

edit
  • A few paragraphs contain some fluff which makes them sound a little redundant.
  • Some of the word choice could be improved on, "procedures" in intro is mentioned but the sections describe the different parts of a game that influence game feel, rather than laid-out procedures that improve it

Glibjibb (talk) 01:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply