NJmeditor
Welcome!
Hello, NJmeditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Summit Medical Group, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 11:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Summit Medical Group edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Summit Medical Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RadioFan (talk) 11:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 23:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nomination of Summit Medical Group for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Summit Medical Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summit Medical Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Fly by Night (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Bain & Company edit
I have tried to help you at Bain & Company. If there are other statements in the section that you object to, I suggest that you use the same model that I used to deal with them.--Toddy1 (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have now done three reversions of attempts to put back material in this article. I cannot do any more reversions for another 24 hours. If this material keeps being added back, you will have to revert it yourself.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. The same two users just keep adding the content back in. Very frustrating, but your suggestions on how to deal with them were very helpful, since I am relatively new on Wikipedia.NJmeditor (talk) 10:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- It is worth your knowing that there is a 3-revert rule on Wikipedia - see below:
- An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation.
- If an editor breaks the 3-revert rule, you can report him on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. If you make a report, you are expected to show at least four "diffs" proving reversion by the same editor. The format for reporting "diffs" is as follows:
- --Toddy1 (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- It is worth your knowing that there is a 3-revert rule on Wikipedia - see below:
- Thank you. The same two users just keep adding the content back in. Very frustrating, but your suggestions on how to deal with them were very helpful, since I am relatively new on Wikipedia.NJmeditor (talk) 10:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)