NI24SD

Your submission at Articles for creation: The History Chicks (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:The History Chicks may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, NI24SD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TipsyElephant (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

The History Chicks

I think the podcast is notable and I have been editing the draft. I apologize for any drastic changes that you might find alarming. I'm trying to make the article meet various Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you have any questions about the edits I'm making feel free to leave a message on my talk page: User talk:TipsyElephant. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting the page. I think I might take out the bit about it being a feminist podcast as I don't think it necessarily is. NI24SD (talk) 22:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

The statement has a reliable secondary source to verify the claim. Wikipedia pages summarize what reliable secondary sources say about the subject. Many people think that getting a Wikipedia article is always a good thing, but Wikipedia articles contain the good and bad about their subjects and sometimes the subjects of the articles may disagree with the article's contents. Wikipedia is not a place where you should promote your own ideas or favor original research over reliable sources.

It's also worth noting that feminism is an extremely broad category. A lot of people seem to think it means something very specific. There are different waves of feminism from different times and with different ideas. If you think women should be allowed to vote or own property you probably qualify as some type of feminist. TipsyElephant (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The History Chicks has been accepted

The History Chicks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TipsyElephant (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)