N2020w
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Pittsburgh/The_Archaeologist_Looks_at_Death_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome! edit
Hello, N2020w, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review edit
Hi N2020W! This is Kelly and I just completed your peer review. I noticed you haven't added anything or written out your plan yet, but I think there's a lot of room for improvement in your article so you shouldn't have a difficult time finding things to work on! The biggest issue with your article, to me, seems to be the sources. There are not very many, and the ones that due exist belong to a very limited collection of authors. You could do a lot of citation work, and that could help you potentially find new/more information to add to the article at the same time! Here are the five suggestions that I left in the actual peer review:
1. Make sure the information in the lead is covered in the rest of the article.
2. Add citations! It seems like there's a lot of info that isn't cited throughout the article. For example, there is no citation for "The structure is 24 m (79 ft) high, plus an additional 6 m (20 ft) for the temple at the top. The square base measures 55.3 m (181 ft) across," which definitely seems like something that needs to be cited.
3. Try to find citations from various authors and that are easily accessible for those viewing the article. There are very few authors cited in this article.
4. Make sure all information is in the correct section.
5. I think you could maybe add a new section or two, as the topic feels like it would have more available information than is provided. The article feels a bit short and could use some different sections/further explanations!
In general, I think there is a lot to work with here. Citations and sources are a great place to start!