User talk:Mx. Granger/Archives/2023
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year, Mx. Granger!
Mx. Granger,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 23:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 23:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Happy New Year to you too! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Coat of arms of Lithuania on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Fox Hill Prison
On 9 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fox Hill Prison, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to Viktor Kožený's lawyer, Fox Hill Prison in the Bahamas is known for "breaking even the toughest of men"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fox Hill Prison. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fox Hill Prison), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 8,266 views (688.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Turkey on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:In the news on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Two Lovers and a Beachcomber by the Real Sea
On 11 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Two Lovers and a Beachcomber by the Real Sea, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sylvia Plath criticized her own award-winning poem for its "old crystal-brittle and sugar-faceted voice"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Two Lovers and a Beachcomber by the Real Sea. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Two Lovers and a Beachcomber by the Real Sea), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Two years! |
---|
Thank you for the lovely DYK! What do you think of an infobox, compare When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Good idea – I'll add one. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 23:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Iran–Saudi Arabia relations
On 14 March 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Iran–Saudi Arabia relations, which you updated and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 19:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for The Scout Mindset
On 18 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Scout Mindset, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Scout Mindset, a book about being able to change one's mind, took five years to be published partly because author Julia Galef changed her mind about what to write? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Scout Mindset. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Scout Mindset), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
App to add photos
Dear User:Mx. Granger Can you make an app that will prompt a user to take a photo when near an article's location when there is no photo? If the app can add categories too, that would be great. Geraldshields11 (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's an interesting idea. I've never done any mobile app development, but maybe that's something that could be added to the Wikimedia Commons mobile app. That app already lets the user check for nearby locations that need pictures (and upload photos with categories), but as far as I know it doesn't notify the user when they're close to one of the locations. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 01:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of vegetarian and vegan companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perfect Day.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Third Month Fair
On 10 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Third Month Fair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to legend, the Third Month Fair was originally held on the Moon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Third Month Fair. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Third Month Fair), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Timothée Chalamet on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Bahrainization
On 29 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bahrainization, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as part of Bahrainization, the Bahraini government prohibited foreigners from driving taxis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bahrainization. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bahrainization), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Question on article "Gender Neutrality"
Dear Mx. Granger,
My name is Alex from Germany and I have a question regarding the article "Gender Neutrality" to which you also made contributions. Following passage:
"There are also cases where a distinct female form exists, but the basic (or "male") form does not intrinsically indicate a male (such as by including man), and can equally well be applied to any member of the profession, whether male or female or of unspecified sex. Examples include actor and actress; usher and usherette; comedian and comedienne. In such cases, proponents of gender-neutral language generally advocate the non-use of the distinct female form (always using comedian rather than comedienne, for example, even if the referent is known to be a woman)."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_neutrality_in_English
What does "such as by including man" refer to? Does this simply mean that, for example, the word "actor" does not intrinsically indicate a male in contrast to other words like "fireman" which intrinsically include "man"?
Or does the reference in the parantheses want to tell something else?
Thanks for your feedback in advance!
Kind regards
Alex AlexanderDude (talk) 17:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think your interpretation is correct. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:37, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Lixia
On 5 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lixia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lixia traditions include weighing people, brewing seven-family tea, and making rice dogs (examples pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lixia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lixia), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Question from Matieland on Wikipedia:Citing sources/Example edits for different methods (09:43, 1 May 2023)
Hello,is it possible to change from {{https to http}} Thanks. KIND REGARDS.MATIELAND --Matieland(Matieland,talk page: Matieland) 09:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Matieland, thanks for the message. I'm not sure I understand your question. Is the concern that when you click HTTPS links in Wikipedia articles, you're unable to access them? You can always copy the URL from the link, change the "https" to "http", and access the website with http – for some websites that will work, but not all. But in my opinion, links in articles should continue to use https where possible, to provide better privacy and security for readers.
- If you're asking about accessing Wikipedia itself using HTTP instead of HTTPS, as far as I know this is not possible. There is some related information here and here.
- If this hasn't answered your question, please let me know – I'd be happy to explain further. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 11:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Thanks for the info Mx. Granger. Matieland(Matieland,talk page: Matieland) 10:51, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Question from Nancius on Open house (school) (23:45, 17 May 2023)
Hello. It appears that this article is confusing Open House with Back-to-School Night (BTSN).
BTSN is held annually in the first few weeks of school. It is an event only open to the parents of currently enrolled children. It is an opportunity for parents to meet the teacher, learn about curriculum, standards, expectations, grading policies, and other information.
On the other hand, Open House is an annual event held sometime in the spring to showcase some of the academic learning and accomplishments of the currently enrolled students. This event is open to the students and their families. --Nancius (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Nancius: Thanks for the message. Your definitions of back-to-school night and open house are the same definitions that were used at my schools when I was growing up. It wouldn't surprise me if the terminology varied by region, though. Ideally the article should give a nuanced explanation of how the terms are used. At the very least, I think it should mention the term "back-to-school night" and explain the distinction you've described (ideally cited to a reliable source). Want to try editing the article to add some of this nuance? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wikipedia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this
Great image here, thanks for making it! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message! I can't take the credit, though – the image was made by User:Vanessaezekowitz and User:Rjcflyer@aol.com. I just transferred it to Wikimedia Commons. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:27, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on China–Kosovo relations
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page China–Kosovo relations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Question from InfoSleuth42 on Wikipedia:Teahouse (17:20, 13 May 2023)
Hello,
I was paid to edit an article. As per Wikipedia's guidelines, I have mentioned it in my profile with my agency and client's name. Is there anything other than that that I need to do in order to comply with the COI guidelines of Wikipedia?
I appreciate your help. --InfoSleuth42 (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- @InfoSleuth42: Thanks for the message. The most important thing is the disclosure, so it's good that you have done that. The other requirements and recommendations are explained at these two pages: Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Give those a read, and let me know if anything is confusing or unclear, or if you have any follow-up questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Awesome. I have already read those. Other things are only optional.
- I appreciate your response. I will keep in touch with you.
- I am just curious about how much time it takes to review the drafts? Does COI of the articles effect how much time they take for review? InfoSleuth42 (talk) 13:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Good questions. It generally takes quite a while for drafts to be reviewed – I would expect weeks or months. (Wikipedia has a limited pool of volunteers, and there are always more tasks to be done than people to do them.) I'm not sure whether the COI affects how long it takes – all the drafts go through the same reviewing process, but it's possible some reviewers might choose to focus on certain types of drafts, which would make those get through faster. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Awesome. I appreciate your response.
- I will keep in touch to increase my Wikipedia knowlege. InfoSleuth42 (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Good questions. It generally takes quite a while for drafts to be reviewed – I would expect weeks or months. (Wikipedia has a limited pool of volunteers, and there are always more tasks to be done than people to do them.) I'm not sure whether the COI affects how long it takes – all the drafts go through the same reviewing process, but it's possible some reviewers might choose to focus on certain types of drafts, which would make those get through faster. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Caroline Ellison
You undid my revision describing Caroline Ellison as a fraudster, saying that "we still can't say this in wikivoice until there's a conviction." However, as you can see from the sources I cited, she has already pleaded guilty to multiple fraud charges, months ago, and the judge has accepted her guilty plea, which means that she has been convicted. There is no such thing as a jury trial after a guilty plea; she (as well as Gary Wang and Nishad Singh, and unlike Sam Bankman-Fried) will go straight to sentencing. RaspberryCandy (talk) 00:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- You have a point that with a guilty plea there is not the same doubt about how things will play out as there is with Bankman-Fried. WP:BLPCRIME doesn't specifically address this situation, but especially with BLPs it is best to be cautious in rigorously sticking to the sources. The lead already clearly says that she pleaded guilty to multiple counts of fraud; I don't think we need to say more than that. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Xiazhi
Hello! Your submission of Xiazhi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chidgk1 (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports/Handling sports transactions on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Incels.is on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Question from MainakC24365 (07:17, 12 June 2023)
Can I publish articles which have less than 5 sources of references? --MainakC24365 (talk) 07:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @MainakC24365: Thanks for the message. Yes, there's no problem with having only five sources. But keep in mind that articles need to be about notable topics, and the most common way to demonstrate notability is with significant coverage from multiple independent sources. If most of the five sources are independent reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the subject, it should be fine. But if they're mostly sources like the subject's own website or social media posts, the article might be deleted. You can find more information at Wikipedia:Notability. I hope that helps – let me know if any of that is unclear or if you have any follow-up questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. It was really helpful for clearing my doubts. MainakC24365 (talk) 14:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank You from a New User
The Helping Hand Barnstar | ||
I see that the first of the AFD's I recently created has been closed as Keep. I'd like to award you with this barnstar as a gesture of my appreciation for your substantial participation in the AFD's.
These were the first AFDs I started, and discussing them with you was certainly an educational experience. I especially appreciate that you took the time to respond to me in detail, as I was a new user, when you could have just as easily dismissed my opinion. 33ABGirl (talk) 14:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC) |
- Thanks! It's great to see a new editor who's interested in China-related topics. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I hope to be active in China-related topics, not just in copy-editing and deletions, but also in actual content creation in the future. I hope we can continue to collaborate on these topics. 33ABGirl (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- Glad to hear it! I hope so too. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I hope to be active in China-related topics, not just in copy-editing and deletions, but also in actual content creation in the future. I hope we can continue to collaborate on these topics. 33ABGirl (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Question from Clbro20 (18:01, 13 June 2023)
Need to know what credit companies I owe --Clbro20 (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Clbro20: I don't understand what you mean – can you please clarify? Do you have a question about how to use or edit Wikipedia? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Impossible Whopper
Hello! Your submission of Impossible Whopper at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Morgan695 (talk) 03:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Xiazhi
On 21 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Xiazhi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in ancient China, Xiazhi was the day to sprinkle chrysanthemum ashes on wheat plants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Xiazhi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Xiazhi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PRODs
Hello, Mx. Granger,
Just a reminder that when you tag a page for any time of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/MFD/etc.), it's courteous to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. I'm sure you would like to know if an article you created is headed towards deletion. It's just considered good practice. The way most editors do this is by using Twinkle to tag pages for deletion. It's an editing tool that has a lot of great uses to make editing simpler, so you don't have to remember a lot of templates. Just be sure to set your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator" and then when you tag a page for deletion, Twinkle will post a notice for you on the talk page of the page creator. Thank you for considering changing the way you tag pages for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Liz: Thanks for the reminder. I was aware of this but I might have forgotten for some recent PRODs – sorry about that. I haven't used Twinkle but maybe I'll give it a try. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Impossible Whopper
On 21 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Impossible Whopper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Burger King was taken to court over the Impossible Whopper (example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Impossible Whopper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Impossible Whopper), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 62,418 views (2,600.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Past Talk topics
If a proposal on an article's Talk page has not been active for months, do Wikipedia rules allow me to go ask those editors whether they still have interest? CurryCity (talk) 18:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Generally that should be fine. A common way to do this is to add a new comment in the same section (or start a new section) and ping all the editors who commented in the old discussion, for example using a template like Template:ping. The main guideline to be aware of is Wikipedia:Canvassing, and the main behavior to avoid is selectively asking some editors but not others based on their views. (So for instance, it's generally fine if you ping all participants from the old discussion, but you shouldn't selectively ping the participants who supported the proposal while leaving out the participants who opposed the proposal.) —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Impossible Whopper
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Impossible Whopper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Impossible Whopper
The article Impossible Whopper you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Impossible Whopper and Talk:Impossible Whopper/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Impossible Whopper
The article Impossible Whopper you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Impossible Whopper for comments about the article, and Talk:Impossible Whopper/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Congrats! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for correcting my Pinyin
Dear Mx. Granger,
I am writing to thank you for correcting "Zheng Ma'nuo" to "Zheng Manuo" and moving the page accordingly. It was my mistake not to check the rules of Pinyin beforehand.
--TheLonelyPather (talk) 11:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! Unnecessary apostrophes are a common mistake in pinyin. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 01:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Question from Purpgod Tylee (16:29, 14 July 2023)
Hello. What are the requirements to start creating my own articles. --Purpgod Tylee (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Purpgod Tylee: The main requirement is that the subject of the article must be notable, generally meaning that it has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Outside of that requirement, though, I would recommend that you first spend some time improving existing articles to get familiar with how Wikipedia works before creating a new article. When you do feel ready to create a new one, this page might be useful: Help:Your first article. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Question from MsAlPatina (17:20, 25 July 2023)
Hello there, im glad to be welcomed to this community! i would like to know if its ok to typicly add extra info to pages, one in question is the RCA 1802 page, wich i notice it misses some info about it (compared to pages like the Z80) and its portuguese version doesnt exists, also i would like to add an page for the RCA 1806, do you have any tips as for it? like ways to plan in how to put the data in a easy to follow order? --MsAlPatina (talk) 17:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MsAlPatina: Thanks for the message! Please do add relevant information to the article. It's best to cite a reliable source to support the information you add. If you want, you can start an article about the RCA 1802 on the Portuguese Wikipedia by translating the English article. Just make sure to give attribution when adding translated material, for example by mentioning that the page is a translation in your edit summary and by using a template like pt:Predefinição:Traduzido on the new article's talk page. As for the RCA 1806, there is some guidance about starting a new article here: Help:Your first article. Please let me know if any of this is unclear or if you have any more questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- thanks! Tho most of the data is citted from the datasheet wich was from the main datasheet from the archive cosmacelf page aswell as the community that works with it, i have made an translation but having some issues MsAlPatina (talk) 00:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- @MsAlPatina: Microprocessors aren't my area of expertise, but that sounds reasonable. What kind of issues are you having with the translation? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- because it says it has more text than the original, wich makes sense because portuguese is more complex, (has like 4 more words per sentence on avarage compared to english) MsAlPatina (talk) 02:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- I see. Where are you seeing that message? Are you using the content translation tool or translating some other way? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- im using the one that has the google translate thing, but google translate inserts alot of brasilian terms in MsAlPatina (talk) 02:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm not sure what tool that is – can you post a link? Alternatively you can try asking at the talk page of the tool, or just do a manual translation instead of a machine-assisted one. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- thanks, i think i favouru manual translation, thanks for the reply! MsAlPatina (talk) 03:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm not sure what tool that is – can you post a link? Alternatively you can try asking at the talk page of the tool, or just do a manual translation instead of a machine-assisted one. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- im using the one that has the google translate thing, but google translate inserts alot of brasilian terms in MsAlPatina (talk) 02:47, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- I see. Where are you seeing that message? Are you using the content translation tool or translating some other way? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- because it says it has more text than the original, wich makes sense because portuguese is more complex, (has like 4 more words per sentence on avarage compared to english) MsAlPatina (talk) 02:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- @MsAlPatina: Microprocessors aren't my area of expertise, but that sounds reasonable. What kind of issues are you having with the translation? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:39, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- thanks! Tho most of the data is citted from the datasheet wich was from the main datasheet from the archive cosmacelf page aswell as the community that works with it, i have made an translation but having some issues MsAlPatina (talk) 00:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Defense of Sihang Warehouse on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Unidentified flying object
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Unidentified flying object, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Almaty
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Almaty, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:23, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Almaty
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Almaty, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Question from Max45789 (15:01, 22 August 2023)
Hello Mx. Granger,
I hope this message finds you well.
I have an issue with two talk pages which have split following a page move and I was wondering whether they can be unified. Unfortunately, the very moment I was writing on the talk page, the page was moved which may have caused a split between the article name and talk page name. As far as I was aware, this could only be remedied by blanking the new talk page, in order to ensure that the article and talk page carry the same name. However, this appears to have created two talk pages, one of which presently resides on a redirect page.
The article name is "Candar dynasty" and the previous talk page history is found under "Isfendiyarids". Is there a way to bring the Isfendiyarids talk page history under the Candar dynasty article?
Thank you for your assistance and support. --Max45789 (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Max45789: Thanks for the message. In general, you can move a talk page by going to the talk page and clicking the "Move" link. But in this case the system may not let you do that, because there is content in the target page. If it doesn't let you, then you can post a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests to get help from a page mover or administrator.
- By the way, looking at the history of the article, it looks like you're engaging in a move war, which is considered disruptive behavior. It looks like your moves have been reverted four times by two other users. When a page move is reverted, the right response is not to reinstate it, but to start a discussion following the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Mx. Granger, thank you for your quick reply.
- Yes, regrettably the reason there was content on the talk page was because I was typing the reasons for a page move the very moment it was moved. I have of course to date not received any response or reasons against the move, despite my repeated attempts to engage in an honest discussion by:
- Stating clear and concise reasons for the move on the talk page (more accurately on both talk pages since they have been split) and;
- In the spirit of cooperation that Wikipedia was founded upon, contacting the user that moved the page directly in a genuine bid to resolve the issue through discussion and reaching a consensus whichever way, highlighting that my version is not necessarily the best and that we could reach a more suitable outcome together.
- Despite this, I have unfortunately not received any response to either of the above and have started to question the motives behind the reverts, which separate from the title, also included the removal of verified material and citations that had taken time to compile.
- Thanking you for your guidance and support once again, Max45789 (talk) 11:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It's good that you've started the discussion – thanks for that. For future reference, if a disagreement like this happens again, it's best to stop the page moves and wait for the discussion to conclude, rather than continuing to move-war a few times first. For now, since you've started a discussion and the page is at your preferred title, you can probably leave it alone unless another user weighs in. If someone reverts to the page's stable title again, that would be a good opportunity to start a formal requested move discussion. Do feel free to get help moving the talk page at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, and let me know if you have any other questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Mx. Granger and thank you for your continued support.
- To be honest, I'm not quite sure how to explain how this occurred, with the talk page splitting as I was typing, it doesn't doesn't strike me as the standard article page move that the form above appears created for. I'm actually surprised you understood what happened so easily - do you by any chance know an administrator that you can copy into this conversation?
- Grateful for your assistance again, — Max45789 (talk) 16:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. I've added a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for all your help @Mx. Granger Max45789 (talk) 10:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- It appears to have been fixed! Thank you! Max45789 (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. I've added a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- It's good that you've started the discussion – thanks for that. For future reference, if a disagreement like this happens again, it's best to stop the page moves and wait for the discussion to conclude, rather than continuing to move-war a few times first. For now, since you've started a discussion and the page is at your preferred title, you can probably leave it alone unless another user weighs in. If someone reverts to the page's stable title again, that would be a good opportunity to start a formal requested move discussion. Do feel free to get help moving the talk page at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, and let me know if you have any other questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joint BioEnergy Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emeryville.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vladimir Lenin on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Forbes 30 under 30
I misread the context of the section. My bad - you're absolutely right. --Molochmeditates (talk) 14:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Question from Foodlovee (02:56, 19 September 2023)
Hi What is a proper way to create a topic autority and match topics better? --Foodlovee (talk) 02:56, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Foodlovee: Thanks for the message. I don't think I understand the question – could you please rephrase? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in India on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
Hello, I'm 2601:246:CA80:7D50:A99C:A7FC:AA2D:DF7E. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mondelez International—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. (talk) 04:29, 06 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please see Help:IPA/English for the conventions that these transcriptions should follow. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from Mrixa123 (04:44, 8 October 2023)
Hi, what is the culture of Norway? and traditional? --Mrixa123 (talk) 04:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Mrixa123, there is some information in the Culture of Norway article and in the sources that article cites. If you have more specific questions about Norwegian culture and traditions, you can also try asking at Wikipedia's humanities reference desk. Let me know if you have any questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from Iamindersingh (10:44, 6 October 2023)
HI i wanted to edit the information in this article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free-trade_zones_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates and put correct refferal sites. can you help me or suggest me best way to do as this is my first edit --Iamindersingh (talk) 10:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Iamindersingh: Go for it – click the "Edit" link at the top of the page, make the changes, and when you're finished, click "Publish". Let me know if anything is unclear or if you have any other questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Noted sir Iamindersingh (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from Olguernet (01:06, 27 October 2023)
Hola Mx. Granjero, necesito ayuda para publicar un artículo científicos, y una biografía. gracias --Olguernet (talk) 01:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Olguernet: ¿En inglés o en español? Esta es la versión de Wikipedia en inglés. Para artículos en español, también hay una versión en español. Si deseas publicar un artículo en inglés, puedes encontrar información básica aquí: Help:Your first article, y la página correspondiente en español es es:Ayuda:Tu primer artículo. Por favor, avísame si tienes otra pregunta o duda. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I'm a New Wikipedia Editor..
Hey..Can you Help me with Editing Articles and Finding Certain Websites that have Valid Information? -Thanks A ton.. (Ageri, Noah, Or X)
Nov, 1st 12:20PM Ageri StudiosYT (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Ageri StudiosYT: Sure, I'm happy to help. The pages Help:Editing and Wikipedia:Reliable sources may be helpful. Let me know if you have any specific questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Freddie Freeman on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Muniru23 on Category:Sex workers (11:02, 4 November 2023)
Hi to you all and my name is Halifa and I will like to join your sex job --Muniru23 (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Tuva
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tuva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Question from EVATHEBRIT (22:32, 6 November 2023)
Hello I just wanted to ask a question about how to create a like sand book profile thing because I just wanted to right a small sentence about my account before I go off to talk to other and looked at articles. Thank you 💕 --EVATHEBRIT (talk) 22:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. If you click on this link you should be able to create a user page: User:EVATHEBRIT. Let me know if you have any trouble. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from DRAKERGAMER123 (18:40, 7 November 2023)
Hi pls how do i post my Wikipage on Google --DRAKERGAMER123 (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. Do you mean your userpage (User:DRAKERGAMER123)? I believe Wikipedia userpages are set to disable search engine indexing through a software setting, so you probably won't be able to find it on a Google search. More information here: Wikipedia:Controlling search engine indexing. Wikipedia userpages are intended to support editors' work improving the encyclopedia, not to be used for marketing. Let me know if you have any other questions! —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 04:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from DGSATI (22:18, 11 November 2023)
Hello Mx. Granger. I made a newbie mistake today of creating a page (DGSAT I) instead of moving the draft of it to mainspace. I wonder if there's a way to link the draft and the page on mainspace. Like a redirect page perhaps. --DGSATI (talk) 22:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think you can just convert the draft page to a redirect. In other words, replace the text of Draft:DGSAT I with
#REDIRECT[[DGSAT I]]
. If other users had also contributed to the draft article and material they added had ended up in the mainspace, then the issue might be more complicated to ensure correct attribution, but in this case you were the only author so I don't think there's any issue there. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 22:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Grey1092 (01:55, 24 November 2023)
Hello! This is a message in morse code:
.-- . .----. .-. . / -. --- / ... - .-. .- -. --. . .-. ... / - --- / .-.. --- ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / -.- -. --- .-- / - .... . / .-. ..- .-.. . ... / .- -. -.. / ... --- / -.. --- / .. / -.--. -.. --- / .. -.--.- / .- / ..-. ..- .-.. .-.. / -.-. --- -- -- .. - -- . -. - .----. ... / .-- .... .- - / .. .----. -- / - .... .. -. -.- .. -. --. / --- ..-. / -.-- --- ..- / .-- --- ..- .-.. -.. -. .----. - / --. . - / - .... .. ... / ..-. .-. --- -- / .- -. -.-- / --- - .... . .-. / --. ..- -.-- / .. / .--- ..- ... - / .-- .- -. -. .- / - . .-.. .-.. / -.-- --- ..- / .... --- .-- / .. .----. -- / ..-. . . .-.. .. -. --. / --. --- - - .- / -- .- -.- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- -. -.. . .-. ... - .- -. -.. / -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--. / -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / .-.. . - / -.-- --- ..- / -.. --- .-- -. / -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / .-. ..- -. / .- .-. --- ..- -. -.. / .- -. -.. / -.. . ... . .-. - / -.-- --- ..- / -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / -- .- -.- . / -.-- --- ..- / -.-. .-. -.-- / -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / ... .- -.-- / --. --- --- -.. -... -.-- . / -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / - . .-.. .-.. / .- / .-.. .. . / .- -. -.. / .... ..- .-. - / -.-- --- ..- / .-- . .----. ...- . / -.- -. --- .-- -. / . .- -.-. .... / --- - .... . .-. / ..-. --- .-. / ... --- / .-.. --- -. --. / -.-- --- ..- .-. / .... . .- .-. - .----. ... / -... . . -. / .- -.-. .... .. -. --. --..-- / -... ..- - / -.-- --- ..- .----. .-. . / - --- --- / ... .... -.-- / - --- / ... .- -.-- / .. - / -.--. ... .- -.-- / .. - -.--.- / .. -. ... .. -.. . --..-- / .-- . / -... --- - .... / -.- -. --- .-- / .-- .... .- - .----. ... / -... . . -. / --. --- .. -. --. / --- -. / -.--. --. --- .. -. --. / --- -. -.--.- / .-- . / -.- -. --- .-- / - .... . / --. .- -- . / .- -. -.. / .-- . .----. .-. . / --. --- -. -. .- / .--. .-.. .- -.-- / .. - / .- -. -.. / .. ..-. / -.-- --- ..- / --Grey1092 (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Cpi shaik nadeem on User:Praxidicae/Draftify log (05:34, 26 November 2023)
IM SHAIK NADEEM CPI AMBERPET INCHARGE --Cpi shaik nadeem (talk) 05:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Question from Lynnhe228 (15:26, 30 November 2023)
Hello How do I change my password --Lynnhe228 (talk) 15:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) hi @Lynnhe228: it's done in Special:Preferences. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 15:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
About Chaoxianzu
Thank you for your time and effort. If possible, could you participate in the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chaoxianzu? I would appreciate it. Strategicasian (talk) 18:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Strategicasian. I saw the nomination at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/China and I'm thinking about it. If I have anything useful to contribute, I'll join the discussion. By the way, you may want to read WP:CANVAS. Discussion notifications like this should be used with caution to make sure you don't give the impression of trying to bias the outcome. (I don't think that was your intention with this message and I'm not trying to imply that, it's just a guideline you may want to be aware of for the future.) —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, @Mx. Granger. Thank you for taking the time to consider the participation. Your insights and contributions to the discussion about Chaoxianzu, Chaoxianzu in Japan, Chaoxianzu in Korea would undoubtedly be valuable, and I look forward to potentially reading your input on the matter. I appreciate your advice regarding WP:CANVAS and the importance of maintaining neutrality in discussion notifications. Please rest assured that it was not my intention to influence the discussion's outcome in any particular direction. My goal was simply to bring the topic to the attention of those who might have an interest or expertise in the subject. However, I understand the importance of the guideline you've mentioned and will be more mindful of this in the future to avoid any perception of bias. Thank you again for your thoughtful reminder and for considering participation in the discussion. Your involvement in the Wikipedia community is greatly appreciated. Have a nice week. Strategicasian (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Question from Monurin (07:46, 12 December 2023)
Hello hello! So I wanted to ask - why are the suggested edits of the browser and mobile versions of Wikipedia so vastly different? In the browser version, you can do copyediting, finding citations, and expanding on articles. In the mobile version however, you can add short article descriptions, images, image captions, and image tags. Why don't the people at Wikimedia just *combine* all of these together? Anyways, cheers! --Monurin (talk) 07:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Monurin, thanks for the question. I don't know the answer. I found some information about the mobile version here, but I'm not sure exactly where the suggested edits on the desktop version come from. In general, it's pretty common for things on Wikipedia to be somewhat disjointed and not fully harmonized – that's a natural result of the project's decentralized structure. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
- Hello Mx. Granger/Archives, we need experienced volunteers.
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
- If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
- Cheers, and hope to see you around.
Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Question from Slbs.Shiv (15:22, 18 December 2023)
Hello sir, I've worked on some articles. But when I tried to expand an article, I was not able to find anything there, can you suggest any way to do the same? --(Slbs.shiv) 15:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Slbs.Shiv: Thanks for the message. I'm not sure I understand your question. Do you mean you had trouble finding more information to add to the article? Or are you looking for advice about how to expand articles? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 03:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- yes sir, I find it's very difficult to gather more information to add to the article. (Slbs.shiv) 17:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Slbs.Shiv: That makes sense. When I want to expand an article, I usually look for sources about the topic and try to summarize what they say. Here are some of my go-to places to search for sources –
- Google Scholar
- Google News for current events topics
- Google Books
- Just a plain Google search (or a different search engine if relevant, e.g. Baidu for China-related topics)
- Open Library
- The Wikipedia Library (for some topics there's a wealth of information here, though you'll need a bit more experience on the wiki before you get access)
- Newspapers.com for historical topics (requires a paid subscription, I think, but also available through The Wikipedia Library)
- A local library (and interlibrary loans). Sometimes it surprises me how much information is still available in physical books at libraries but hard to find online.
- Of course, you should always consider whether a source is reliable on the topic before you use it to add information to an article. I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Slbs.Shiv: That makes sense. When I want to expand an article, I usually look for sources about the topic and try to summarize what they say. Here are some of my go-to places to search for sources –
- yes sir, I find it's very difficult to gather more information to add to the article. (Slbs.shiv) 17:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Question from Ruarugbynut2 on Talk:Maurice Richards (02:12, 30 December 2023)
Hello Maurice Richards scored 4 trys for Wales against England in 1969 which has still never been surpassed --Ruarugbynut2 (talk) 02:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ruarugbynut2, thanks for the message. Are you able to cite a reliable source for that claim? If so, feel free to add it to the article. Please let me know if you have any other questions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- they showed the 1969 game on the bbc wales programme Slammed where the commentator mentions that is his fourth try of the game! 2A00:23C6:988C:6001:D5F4:FD72:280E:76EB (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Ruarugbynut2 and 2A00:23C6:988C:6001:D5F4:FD72:280E:76EB: You can cite that using {{Cite episode}} or {{Cite AV media}}, but it would be better to find a source with a reputation for fact-checking rather than just the words of a single commentator. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- they showed the 1969 game on the bbc wales programme Slammed where the commentator mentions that is his fourth try of the game! 2A00:23C6:988C:6001:D5F4:FD72:280E:76EB (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)