User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2018/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WPXT-DT3 Is Now An Affiliate Of Escape, WPXT-DT2 Is H&I, And No More MNTV In Portland, Maine (According To RabbitEars.info)
The MyNetworkTV affiliation on the WPXT-DT3 subchannel appears to have been replaced with Escape, with the H&I affiliation moving to the WPXT-DT2 subchannel (according to RabbitEars.info)…RabbitEars.info States CW-51.1, H&I-51.2, Escape-51.3… (source) Furthermore: neither the WPXT website or the WMTW website offer any mentioning whatsoever of any existing MyNetworkTV-affiliated subchannel (or even the network at all, for that matter). DizzyMosquitoRadio99 (talk) 01:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brenda Blackmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
Why I added 9.3 and 9.4 on KWTV-DT
I live on Oklahoma City and Channel 9 told people to rescan their TVs. When I rescanned, there was a 9.3 and 9.4 that said: Due to FCC constraints, KWTV 9.1 and 9.2 programming will begin November 19th on this channel on both channels. I decided to do the edits because of what I saw on the channels.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited WIAT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madam Secretary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
WMGM-TV new request for semi protection
Just FYI, I made another semi-protection request for the WMGM-TV article, whether they will accept it or not I don't know but I am hoping that if they look at the logs they will see what's happening and agree to change the settings. YborCityJohn (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mvcg66b3r. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
WNET
Your edits contain too many overlinks ie: New Jersey is not needed after Newark, New Jersey. Please familiarize yourself with the following information on when to link: MOS:OVERLINKBlueboyLI (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
You have consistently reverted my edits without bothering to discuss on the talk page and have the audacity to say I started an edit war. Again: Your edits contain too many overlinks ie: New Jersey is not needed after Newark, New Jersey. Please familiarize yourself with the following information on when to link: MOS:OVERLINK As for leaving out the "class a's" that information is already in the info-box. The lede is meant to be brief, not filled with information that's already linked. BlueboyLI (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
PS I went over this very same topic with you a year ago, and you seem to have learned nothing in the year since.
Why do you keep reverting my edits? They're more in depth. And why do you add stuff only to remove it later? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your edits contain too many overlinks ie: Connecticut is not needed after Hartford, Connecticut. Please familiarize yourself with the following information on when to link [1]BlueboyLI (talk) 20:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
As I said, my edits are more in-depth. Yours are kind of bland. And please don't lecture me with that "overlinking" stuff. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Sometimes less is more, esp. when editing lead articles. Your edits lead to reader fatigue with unnecessary redundant links. Other edits are incorrect ie: placing full power stations in the translator field or confusing programming services with networks. BlueboyLI (talk) 02:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Kaiser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Intrastate templates
Stop adding stations into the templates that clearly aren't in a state. You have no consensus for the 'licensed to and serving' line and I'm asking you to seek consensus for this change on WP:TVS before going any further. It just adds visual noise and needless templates into the articles for the sake of templates. Nate • (chatter) 07:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)