Welcome

edit

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Some of your edits to Wikipedia's template and category pages do not appear to have had the intended consequences. In particular, this edit to the "under construction" template and this one to a page in the category system have had unintended consequences to articles other than those on the barefoot horses movement. If you have any questions about editing templates, feel free to drop me a note and I'll try to help out. Once again, welcome to the project! Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD

edit

Removal of an AfD tag counts as vandalism and can get you blocked. You are however very welcome to make your keep !vote in the AfD discussion. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Natural hoof care

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Natural hoof care meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural hoof care. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Beagel (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicole Apelian (January 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Modussiccandi (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mustang Roll! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Modussiccandi (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply