Musabaghirovv

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekvita (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ekvita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ekvita, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Musabaghirovv! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ekvita

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ekvita, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ekvita (February 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Cryptic 12:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Musabaghirovv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, i'm the marketing specialist of company Ekvita which has been establised in 1999. I was blocked my your member with the reason that actually my inquire was promotional but you can take a look to Deloitte, EY, KPMG and other consulting companies pages they were also faced with this issue. We would like to create Wikipedia page for our company and I would like clearify myself with company documents and other legal papers, Please help us in order to solve this problem. Musabaghirovv (talk) 13:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked to continue promoting your organisation. See WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, all of which you've violated. If you have specific evidence that these other pages were written by employees of the company, please provide your specific evidence. Note this will not allow you to also violate these policies, though; see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Finally, note that shared accounts are not permitted, so you'll need to confirm that only a single person has access to this account. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Musabaghirovv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

only i have access to this account and it can be seen from ip adresses i would like clearify with the website's information you can see that there a re different consulting types and our company helps to tousands of people in Azerbaijan please give us access to create our own Wikipage, you can just chheck our website bby clicking ekvita.com Musabaghirovv (talk) 13:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I would like say that again i'm employee and we are not specifically paid for this creation just as a marketing specialist i'm responsible to wiki page. Musabaghirovv (talk) 13:23, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your various requests don't show any indication that you would stop editing your own pages. If the only issue had been a failure to do all the disclosing aspects properly, then I'd be okay with unblocking and talking you through it. However, you also had several blatantly promotional edits. Working in a role for the company and handling it still meets our definition of a "paid editor", even if it wasn't listed as a specific job task. If you wish to return at some stage to Wikipedia to edit more generally, UTRS, our email unblock service, can be utilised. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This appears to be a case of WP:IDHT. Which part of "You will not be unblocked to continue promoting your organisation" did you find confusing? --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

What I found so offensive about this user's editing was the protests on Draft talk:Ekvita that the article wasn't promotional - which is, of course, ok, but not when followed up by removing all doubt with edits like this. Also saw, after the fact, that EranBot thinks it was a copyvio. —Cryptic 13:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

• Yes i can but i'm trying to full fill all the requirements like referencing and other proofs to get approved by you, i mean one of specialist tried to do the wiki page but they didn't have enough experience for wiki pages but i have helped my several friends for creating wiki pages but they were personal pages, this was the first page that i was trying and now also trying to creat. Mr I appreciate you and you patience but i need a guide to open this wiki page for our company. Musabaghirovv (talk) 13:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

As you are refusing to listen to what you've been told and have clearly expressed you have no intention of adhering to WP:COI and WP:PROMO, I have revoked your talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. If your current request is declined and if you are interested in writing about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, WP:UTRS will be available to you. I'll warn you, if you waste their time like you've been wasting our time, you'll lose that option, too. --Yamla (talk) 13:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)