Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Benedict's Church, Auckland (January 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 02:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, MurdochNewman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 02:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reliability of Sources

edit

I'm wondering why the sources cited were deemed unreliable? I cited the Churches' own website which uploaded a short history that was written in 1988 and came out of the Churches' archives.

Citing the Church's own website would be considered as primary source in Wikipedia. This is considered as not reliable. You should insert sources which are independent (called third party sources), e.g. mainstream publication, newspapers or books. You could search for major christian magazines or weekly publication by the christian community to source for your submission. EROS message 08:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply