April 2020

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu, from its old location at User:Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Orange Mike | Talk 12:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Dear Sir, "Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu" This page is not for the promotion, that page was for a film which got released on 5th May 2017 which is almost 3 years back, So I was trying to create a page of the said film Mukkadarpur ka Majnu by the same user name, as I am very new to the Wikipedia so I thought User name and Page name should be same, Nobody is paying me, and nobody pays writing for the history, as the film is history for us, again I am saying it is not for the promotion, we promote the current things, not the past things, Unknowingly if I ever violated and guidelines for the please forgive me, and please unblock me, as this article would be the big motivation to write Articles for Wikipedia: Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu (talkcontribs) 18:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Thank you very much, and welcome back. Please request a rename at Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS before making any edits. You have been unblocked under the following unblock conditions: These conditions are for an indefinite amount of time. You can appeal them, individually or as a whole, at WP:AN at any time. Ideas for contributing to Wikipedia can be found at the Task Center and the community portal. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu / masterandthelearner, are you interested in editing about anything else than Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi ToBeFree/ off course I would, but my interest lays in films, Bios of influencers and history, if mukkadarpur ka majnu film page got approved that would be a motivation for me to contribute more for Wikipedia, Hence I request you to unblock me and allow me to finish the page that started.
Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu / masterandthelearner, I can understand this motivation. However, I personally would not like to unblock you to continue writing about Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu. You have been blocked for making promotional edits about the topic, and you have even chosen "Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu" as your username, so I believe that you may have a close connection to the topic. Your conflict of interest led to problems, and you will probably not be unblocked to edit about the same film again.
Would you agree to the following unblock conditions?
These conditions would apply for an indefinite amount of time. You could appeal them at WP:AN at any time. Is this okay for you?
Ideas for contributing to Wikipedia in other ways can be found at the Task Center and the community portal. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
~ ToBeFree (talk)Okay, I will honor the above points — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu (talkcontribs) 10:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Orangemike, what do you think about this? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

As long as those terms are abided by, sure. I'd like to see a userpage soon with some info about how you see yourself helping in this project. We Westerners are painfully aware of cultural bias in this project towards the Anglophone portions of the planet. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much, Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu / masterandthelearner and Orangemike. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
The "partial block" part is a mess; I will probably remove the partial block one day, and/or do not object to anyone doing so without asking me before. "You will not edit about Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu." is clear enough, we don't really need the block to enforce this forever. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu

edit
 

Hello, Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mukkadarpur Ka Majnu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply