December 2023 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chik Balapur (1771), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 16:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Chik Balapur (1771( edit

 

A tag has been placed on Battle of Chik Balapur (1771( requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Schminnte [talk to me] 17:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Battle of Chik Balpur (1771) edit

Hello, Muhammad khan23

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Andrevan, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Battle of Chik Balpur (1771), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Andrevan}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Andre🚐 02:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multiple accounts edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating successive accounts to create and recreate drafts and articles without identfying your previous accounts. Techincal evidence shows that this isn't a case of a lost password, but willful creation and use of multiple accounts. I imagine you've been doing this for some time and, in all likelihood, are evading a block.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyobons mots 23:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Chik Balpur edit

  Hello, Muhammad khan23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Chik Balpur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply