The article Mortgage Cadence Orchestrator™ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Spam only account. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MtgTechy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am related to Mortgage Cadence (as seen in my profile and email address); however, I still feel that I would be able to post unbiased content. I understand the conflict of interesest, yet, I can post Mortgage banking related information without them having a huge slant towards the Mortgage Cadence offering as my previous post had. --tg (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

That's good, but it's not sufficient. Have you read and understood WP:COI and WP:BFAQ fully? This request makes me feel a bit uneasy. If you agree to follow WP:COI and not edit inappropriately, it would be reasonable to unblock you and allow you to make other edits. However you'll also have to change your username to something personal. If you agree to all this, post a new unblock request, and specify a new username you intend to change to. Mangojuicetalk 20:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to MtgTechy (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Mangojuicetalk 04:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock|Agreed. New username to be MtgTechy}}


unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MtgTechy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi NalinWiki, As I stated, I was not complete, I was just posting content as a starting point and then planning to mold in a more historical format and begin including relationships with associations and articles that have been published in independent sources. I did not intend to have the page “published” and was hoping to simply save the content as I went. Based on your comment, I assume I can work freely when on my userpage and once I am ready to have it external I then move it to the main article page. I did not know this. I will simply create all the content in the user area, ensure that it is not an advertisement and then move it to a real page. I assure you it will not be an advertorial.--tg (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It seems likely that you are directly related to the "Mortgage Cadence Orchestrator" and thus, all of your edits have been inappropriate (see WP:COI, WP:NOT, and particularly, WP:BFAQ). If you are actually not related to mortgagecadence.com, please state so for the record by creating a new unblock request. — Yamla (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My thoughts

edit

I'm sorry that you were blocked like this. Basically what happened is the admin who blocked you assumed you were a spammer. You may be asked to change your username though as promotional usernames aren't usually allowed. If you have any questions email me. I'm on your side.--Urban Rose 18:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


    • I have a hard time believing you, since you *twice* moved the content you were typing from your userpage to the main article space, and because all versions of the article included promotional language like "No other system in the market today can deliver this level of fully integrated performance to accelerate the tempo of your enterprise." I will unblock you *if* you promise to (1) read WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM, and not to post promotional/advertising copy, and (2) read WP:CORP and WP:V, and not post an article about this company or its products unless you can show that they are notable, as supported by reliable independent sources (note that the company's own website or PR materials are not "independent." NawlinWiki (talk) 18:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Basically you need to be creating a encyclopedia article, not an advertisement.--Urban Rose 18:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
      • Hi NalinWiki,

As I stated, I was not complete, I was just posting content as a starting point and then planning to mold in a more historical format and begin including relationships with associations and articles that have been published in independent sources. I did not intend to have the page “published” and was hoping to simply save the content as I went. Based on your comment, I assume I can work freely when on my userpage and once I am ready to have it external I then move it to the main article page. I did not know this. I will simply create all the content in the user area, ensure that it is not an advertisement and then move it to a real page. I assure you it will not be an advertorial. --tg (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, that's good. Anyway, I know that NawlinWiki seemed harsh, but please try to feel welcome here and don't even consider leaving :)--Urban Rose 00:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply