edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Micro-urban, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.fox-companies.com/local_community/index.html. As a copyright violation, Micro-urban appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Micro-urban has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Micro-urban

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Micro-urban, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fox-companies.com/local_community. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Micro-urban

edit
 

The article Micro-urban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NEO; this is a term of recent coinage of little significance and almost no coverage in reliable sources. Furthermore, WP:NOTPROMOTION: The article history makes it clear this emerged as a vehicle to promote the micro-urban concept developers in Champaign-Urbana began to push about 5 years ago. The bits and pieces of original research as to other places that fit the mold at this point only mask the issue. Most of the sources are minor coverage, consist of advertising copy, or discuss the promotion of the concept in some way.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 13:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Micro-urban for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Micro-urban is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro-urban until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 14:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply